By the way, if this is beginning to sound like a wrestling match, I don't mean it to.
顺便说一下,我可没有把这个博弈,弄得像摔跤比赛的意思
The Bronx zoo is incredible, fantastic, very well-maintained, sprawling zoo with so much to see and do.
布朗克斯动物园简直是棒极了,而且维护得很不错,庞大的动物园里有许多可看、可玩的东西。
Some physical objects can do things of a far more interesting sort than other physical objects.
某些物理对象,可做的事远远比,其他物理对象能做的事有趣得多
This is the effort cost. Similarly, player II, everything's symmetric here Player II's payoff is the same thing.
这是她的努力成本,由对称可得,参与人II的收益是一样的
Maybe the answer, or an answer, to this question is revealed in the Crito, the companion dialogue, the companion speech that goes along with the Apology, although it typically gets much less attention than the Apology.
也许答案或任何一种响应,这个问题的答案都可在《克里托篇》寻得,这是柏拉图的另一篇语录,另一篇,与《苏格拉底自辩篇》等齐的辩论,但一般较少受到,与《苏格拉底自辩篇》等同的注意。
Well it has to do with our distance from food, our psychological and physical distance from food, and the fact that we don't appreciate it as much as we do because it's everywhere all the time and we've been trained to eat outside of the normal meal times.
我想这和我们与食物之间的距离有关,包括与食物之间的心理距离和身体上距离,事实上,我们没有给予食物足够的重视,因为食物随手可得,无处不在,而且我们都习惯在非用餐时间吃东西
My teacher won't accept late work and I can't get a bad grade.
我的老师逾期就不再收作业了,而且我可不能得一个太差的成绩。
Yeah! How much time do you have! No. I mean my,
哇!这你可得花时间听了!我的
Now I could go through again and do exactly the same thing for Player II, but I'm not going to do that because everything's symmetric.
如果我照此计算同理可得参与人II的,我就不算了,因为都是对称的
So similarly, I would find that ?2 2 equals 1 plus B S1 and this is the best response of Player II, as it depends on Player I's choice of effort S1.
同理可得?2等于1+B*S1,?2是参与人II的最佳对策,因为它与参与人I的策略S1有关
应用推荐