Hobbes insists on the fundamental equality of human beings, who he says are endowed with certain natural and inalienable rights.
霍布斯认为,人类应该是,基本平等的,他认为人类天生就被赋予了,一些自然和不可剥夺的权利。
and take a spot from somebody who might be more well-qualified.
这样就占用了许多名额,剥夺了那些本来有更高素质的学生的入学机会。
What is punishment? To be thrown out of Eden, to be thrown out of this isolated condition of perfection.
是什么样的惩罚,就是被赶出伊甸园,被剥夺了这种完美的世外桃源生活
Death is bad insofar as it deprives you of a chunk of life that would have been good.
死亡是坏的,因为它剥夺了,你的本可以美好的生命。
Does Locke have a way out of this or is he basically sanctioning an all-powerful government, despite everything he says about unalienable rights?
洛克对此能自圆其说吗,还是说他其实是支持万能政府的呢,尽管他说了那么多什么不可剥夺的权利?
Bourgeois and burghers, as I said last time, are urban residents who are losing their privileges on the continent to big-time absolute states.
中产阶级和市民,正如我上次所讲的,这些城市居民是那些在欧洲大陆,被绝对主义国家剥夺权利的人
You have the image of the cutting off, the castration, of the power of generativity. All poetic potency, all power to assert oneself in the world, can be severed and that's it.
有阉割,切除繁殖能力的,的形象,诗人的所有能力,所有能居于世上的力量都可以被剥夺,就是这样。
Take our founding documents " the Declaration of Independence the Constitution all men are created equal that we are endowed with inalienable rights that all legitimate government grows out of consent and the like.
举我们的建国文件,“独立宣言,“宪法“来看,所有人生而平等,我们与生俱来不容剥夺的权利,这是所有合法政府,都认同的概念。
But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights, if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
但这些人类法律合法的唯一前提,就是尊重我们的自然权利,尊重我们不可剥夺的生命,自由和财产权。
First, that the rights are unalienable and therefore, I don't really own myself after all.
首先,有些权力是不可剥夺的,所以我并非真正地拥有自己。
But still, details and complications of the sort we've been considering aside, the fundamental badness of death is that it deprives me of life worth having.
但是,这种细节和复杂因素,我们不去考虑,死亡的基本坏处就是,它剥夺了值得拥有的生活。
Maybe I have a right not to be depersonified, to have my personality destroyed.
而是我有不被剥夺作为人的资格的权利,有人格不被破坏的权利。
It's the idea that our natural rights are unalienable.
他认为自然权利是不可剥夺的。
Nontransferable tickets are unalienable.
不可转让的门票,就是不可剥夺的。
It's now exactly that power from which Milton has been excluded by virtue of his blindness -- light: "Hail holy Light, offspring of Heav'n first-born, / Or of th' Eternal Coeternal beam May I express thee unblam'd?"
而是弥尔顿已经被失明剥夺的一种力量,圣光,你是上帝最初的产物,永恒的光束,我是否可以向你表达我无限的敬意“
His view is man was happy and good before the invention of society, which society corrupts man and takes away from him his happiness.
他认为在社会形成以前,人类是幸福快乐的,社会使人类堕落并剥夺了人们的幸福
So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights, can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
所以即使多数人掌权,多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利,不能侵犯你基本的生命,自由和财产权。
What grounds are there for withholding ascriptions of beliefs and desires to the computer?
剥夺电脑这些特质的,依据是什么
There is punishment and before you know it, everybody is insecure in the enjoyment of his or her unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
就能惩罚他,不知不觉间,所有人不可剥夺的生命,自由,和财产权都没了保障。
The only constraint given by the law of nature is that the rights we have, the natural rights we have we can't give up nor can we take them from somebody else.
自然法唯一制约的,是我们拥有的这些自然权利,我们不能放弃,也不能剥夺他人的。
And the answer I propose is the deprivation account.
我建议的答案是剥夺解释。
On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up, and that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.
一方面,我们有不可剥夺的生命,自由和财产权,这意味着即使我们自己也无权放弃,正是这些权利,造成了对合法政府的限制。
So it deprives you of pleasure.
它剥夺了你的快乐。
So, what starts out as a seemingly benign state of nature where everyone is free and yet where there is a law and the law respects people's rights, and those rights are so powerful that they're unalienable.
乍一看自然状态是十分良善的,人人皆自由,但还有自然法,自然法尊重人们的权利,而这些权利是如此强大,它们是不可剥夺的。
Unalienable rights.
不可剥夺的权利。
According to the deprivaton account, death is bad, when it's bad, because of the fact that it deprives us of the good things in life, insofar as we would have continued to get good things in life.
根据剥夺解释,死亡是坏的时才是坏的,因为它剥夺了我们生的美好,在我们还能继续从生命中获得美好时。
We have to not talk-- just talk about the good things in the life, but the good of life itself, and we have to notice that perhaps on certain views, for certain cases, it's not really the case that when I die I'm being deprived of a good life.
我们不但要看到-,生活中的美好事物,还要看到活着本身的好处,我们发现也许有某些观点,在某些情况下,情况则不完全是这样,即我死之后不会被剥夺美好的生活。
应用推荐