And so yes, the signal that this field of discursivity is on the table is introduced by the name of the author but it remains just a name.

所以的确，这种公开的散漫性的信号,就通过作者的名字被介绍出来，而且也仅仅只是个名字。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

This is 1969, and the purpose that's alleged for appealing to the author as a paternal source, as an authority, is, according to both Barthes and Foucault, to police the way texts are read.

这是1969年，断言把作者作为一种,父性的资源，一种权威的目的，根据巴特和福柯的说法，是为了监督文本被阅读的方式。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

He says, "They aren't authors. They're founders of discursivity," and then he grants that it's kind of difficult to distinguish between a founder of discursivity and an author who has had an important influence. Right?

他说：“他们不是作者，他们是散漫性的创始人“,然后他认为很难区分,究竟散漫性的创始人和作者,哪个的影响更重要，对吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So Greenberg, and since him, Brettler, and many others, have argued that the principle of divine authorship has certain very important implications. First, it has a significant effect on the scope of the law.

所以Greenberg和他之后的Brettler以及其他很多学者,都认为，作者身份的神圣性原则有某些意义重大的,含意，首先，它对法律的适用范围有重要影响。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选