And so, in the real world frankly, these kinds of questions, how much time is this gonna take is certainly germane.
但在现实世界中,不同种类的问题,所花费的时间是不同的。
I don't mean that the animals are identical me, but their reality is just as pure and indefeasible as my reality.
我并不是说动物和我一样,但它们的现实和我的现实,是一样纯粹,一样不可废弃的。
This is a special case, though, because I've assumed that the assets are independent of each other, which isn't usually the case.
这是一个特例,因为我假设了,这个投资组合里的资产是相互独立的,但现实中通常都不是这样的。
But in the real world when dealing with humans, but even when dealing with animals, we don't actually always use primary reinforcers or negative reinforcers.
但当我们在现实中训练人类,甚至是训练动物时,我们实际上并不总是用到初级强化物,或是负强化物。
Now, a lot of today is going to be fairly abstract, so I just want to remind you that Game Theory has some real world relevance.
今天所讲的很多内容会很抽象,但我想要提醒大家,博弈论与现实世界是紧密联系的
It could be that even though the general claim, "It takes one to know one" Is false, the particular claim, "Eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical," Maybe that particular claim is true.
即使一般来说,同类互知这个观点是错的,但它的特例,也就是永恒的非现实的东西只能被永恒的,非现实的东西所理解,这可能是对的
So this is true, but it doesn't actually change the result.
纵使它是现实,但它对结果没有影响
Now, unfortunately, life doesn't work like that.
但不幸的是,现实是残酷的。
We all do believe something makes it true that two plus one equals three, but it's not the fact that empirical objects-- We don't do empirical experiments to see whether two plus one equals three.
我们都相信有些东西,使2加1等于3是正确的,但这不是说现实的东西,我们不会在现实中做实验,去看看二加一是不是等于三
应用推荐