for short...to answer that question, we need to get clearer about: What exactly is it for something to be me?

等等这些问题,我们需要先清楚以下问题,我究竟是什么东西

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If you have a piece of scrap paper with you, suppose that you've started your program as follows.

如果你有一张废弃的纸张，假如你已经开始了以下的问题。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

and specifically what I mean is we can ask questions like what the neuro substrates support desire?

而且特别值得一提的是，我们可以问以下问题,哪些神经物质让人产生欲望？

斯坦福公开课 - 7个颠覆你思想的演讲课程节选

So this is what he asked them to do: Select four answers to the question 'What should a reader be to be a good reader?' "The reader should belong to a book club."

这就是他要求学生们做的：,从以下四个选项中选取问题,“读者如何才能成为好读者”的答案：,“读者应该是书友会的成员“

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

The grades for the course will be assigned roughly, and I use the word roughly because we reserve the right to move these numbers around a little bit, but basically in the following percentages: 55% of your grade comes from the problem sets, the other 45% come from the quizzes.

课程的评分将会很严格，我用严格这个词儿,是因为我们保留,微调分数的权利，但是基本在以下范围内：,55%的分数来自于问题的提出，另外45%来自于测验。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Consider the following, ? can philosophy and politics actually be united?

再细想以下问题，哲学与政治真能合一吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Remember our concern isn't straightly speaking with the question did the soul exist before our birth, did the soul exist before our bodies, but rather is the soul is immortal.

记住我们关注的并非是,对以下问题之前的回答,即灵魂是否先于出生而存在，灵魂是否先于身体而存在，而是灵魂是否不朽。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So the real question is how does he himself figure it out between " "I agree to give up my life, give up my property" when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact.

所以真正的问题是，他如何能自圆其说以下观点,“我同意放弃我的生命，放弃我的财产“,当他谈到税收制或征兵制时是这样说的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

At the end of last class,I began to raise the question as to whether or not we should distinguish two questions that we would normally be inclined to run together.

在上节课的最后我提出以下问题,是否该要区别这两个,我们通常倾向于一视同仁的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I mean, consider just some of the following.

考虑以下的问题吧。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Instead,I want to raise the following question.

换而提出以下问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We've been posing the following question.

我们提出过以下问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, that's something I want you to think about and maybe I'm sure you'll want to talk about in your sections, but let me propose something like the following to answer or at least to respond to this paradox, this question.

这是我要你们思考的问题,我也确定,你们也想要在讨论时段发言，但让我先提出以下这些回答,或至少说是响应这个悖论，这个问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选