And notice because I have just one line of code inside of each of these branches, what have I clearly omitted?

请注意因为我在每个分支中只有一行代码,显然地我省略了什么？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

I'm much better having an exception get handled at the time of input than to let that prop -- that value rather propagate through a whole bunch of code until eventually it hits an error 17 calls later, and you have no clue where it came from.

不是我期望的格式,这时我最好有一个异常处理,而不是让其传下去,这个值传到代码的整个分支,最终会导致一个错误17调用的发生，并且你不知道这个错误是哪里来的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So there's a return branch on every possible path through the code. And that's valuable, it's something you want to think about as your right your own.

所以代码中每条可能的路径,都会有一个返回值分支，这是非常有价值的,当你自己写程序的时候也应该考虑这件事。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

First one, when I write a piece of code, especially code that has branches in it, when I design test cases for that piece of code, I should try and have a specific test case for each possible path through the code.

第一点，当我们写代码的时候，尤其是一些含有分支语句的代码的时候，当我为这些代码,设计测试用例的时候，我应该为每一个可能的程序路径,都设计一个特别的用例。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选