It was a thorough examination of that problematic leading to the conclusion that that's what the myth was about.
他的解读是对这个问题的彻底考察,最终得出这个神话是关于什么。
Any thoughts? Don't you hate professors who stand here waiting for you to answer, even when they have candy?
你们难道不讨厌站在那儿等你回答问题,的教授么?虽然他有糖果做奖品哦,用少于线性时间完成可能么?
Both Guillory and Angus Fletcher are examining the troubled relation of Milton to one of his favorite poets.
无论是古伊洛还是安格斯弗莱彻,他们都在研究弥尔顿最爱的一首诗中和他相关的问题。
Both his parents are psychologists and he hates these questions and at times he just screws around with us.
他的父母都是心理学家,他恨透了这些问题,所以他会时不时的忽悠我们一下。
I don't believe that. So the question is, what kind of unity was he expecting ? of philosophy and politics?
我绝不相信所以问题是,他期待何种结合发生在,哲学与政治之间?
Like how can you possibly figure that out with actually compelling a machine to do it for you and sure enough we chatted for a few moments, I kind of gently pointed out well it's kind of like problem 7 last year.
就好像去逼计算机为你做这件事,就能解决问题一样,我们确实谈过这个问题,我委婉地告诉他,这种情况与我们去年讲过问题7类似。
And, when he asks on their wedding night, she gives him an answer that only makes him more obsessed with the question.
当他在新婚之夜问这个问题时,海伦给了一个,只会让他更加对这个问题好奇的答案。
Back to our hypothetical, you know, our initial discussion of Flaming Hot Cheetos: by his definition that would not qualify as food.
再回过头来谈谈我们之前的假定,我们曾讨论过关于火焰辣奇多的问题,按照他的定义,奇多不能算作食物
Now these worries were raised by John Locke the great British philosopher, and he thought, this is too big a pill to swallow.
这是约翰·洛克提出的,他是伟大的英国哲学家,他认为,这个问题太大。
He was being interviewed by Carl Reiner, and he would ask him questions, and in his comic German accent he would give silly answers.
卡尔·雷纳介绍了一下他,然后问了他几个问题,接着他会带着,滑稽的德国腔去做出荒唐的回答
That's Socrates, that's the great message of Socrates He then said the trouble with human being is they have language and therefore they get confused.
这段话是苏格拉底说的,这就是苏格拉底的名言,他接着说人类的问题是,他们的语言会让他们迷惑。
I think the best answer to that is a quote from one of my contemporaries, who I think is one of the best investment managers out there.
我可以用我同行的一句话,来回答这个问题,他在我眼中是最优秀的投资经理
He is the author of the "Race Matters","Democracy Matters", "Restoring Hope","Prophecy Deliverance","Hope on a Tightrope", and now we have a new book out, which is "Brother West: Living and Loving Out Loud".
他著有《种族问题》,《民族问题》,《重塑希望》,《摆脱预言》,《钢索上的希望》,而现在又有一本新书出版,即《尽全力去爱和生活》
Let's put ourselves in Hannibal's shoes, they're probably boots or something.
我们应该站在汉尼拔的立场来看问题,管他穿的是鞋子还是靴子呢
Yeats explores that experience, which is an experience of suffering here and of violation, through a series of rhetorical questions, which are a crucial poetic device for Yeats.
叶芝探索了这种感受,这里这是一种痛苦,一种暴力,表现为一系列隐喻的问题,这是他写诗的一种手法。
It's safe to say that Lycidas is one of the last poetic works of Milton's that's really consumed with his problem, the problem of fruitless anticipation.
谨慎的说,是弥尔顿最后的,切实地与他自身的问题有关的诗篇之一,他自身关于毫无成果的期望的问题。
Thank you. I mean, I know I sort of said it to you, but you're right. It's logarithmic, right?
但你们是正确的,是对数级的,它有这样的效率是因为他每次能把问题减半?
And one of them is the quiz master and the quiz master gets to ask questions, any question he or she wants.
让其中一个来当提问者,提问者负责提问问题,他或她想问什么问题都可以。
So, in a way we are the solvers of this problem for him; ; we are the other half that completes the aesthetic experience; we are there to participate in it with him.
所以,我们某种程度上也是他的问题的解决者;,我们是使美学体验完整的另一方;,我们和他一起参与。
How can Milton know that he was really and truly called by God to be a great poet until he writes something - it's not a bad question - until he has something actually to show for his talent?
弥尔顿怎么知道他是不是真的被,上帝选中了去做一个伟大的诗人,除非他真的创作出点儿什么--这是一个不坏的问题,-直到他真有可以证明自己才能的作品?
He gets to ask all of those questions that are most pressing to him, John Milton.
在诗中弥尔顿得以问那些,最困扰着他的问题。
But his question is still one that lingers and one that Plato includes for a purpose.
但他的问题仍萦回不散,且柏拉图是因为一个目的来加以收录。
He lays out these questions at the very beginning of the fourth book of the Politics.
他将这些问题安排在《政治学》,第四册起始的篇章中。
Typically again he seems to answer the question from two different points of view giving each perspective its due its justice.
很典型地,他回答问题的方式,似乎再次从两个不同的观点出发,让每种看法都有发言的机会。
The question is: The conflicts in psychosexual development always assumes that a child has a mother and a father, one of each, in a certain sort of familial structure.
他提的问题是:,弗洛伊德在描述性心理发展过程中,总是假设孩子是拥有父母的,是处于特定的家庭结构之中的。
But then the question is, for Aristotle, the question he poses for us is: Logos What is the connection between logos, ? the capacity for speech of rationality, and politics?
但问题是,对亚里士多德而言:,他丢给我们的问题是:什么,即辩论合理性的能力与政治之间的关连?
Because, depending on which of his classes he passed and which of his classes he failed, the question was going to be, ? was he going to graduate or not?
因为,根据他哪些课及格了,哪些课不及格了,问题变成了,他能否毕业?
You can ask him about that.
你们可以向他请教这个问题
It's an interesting question as to whether he really explains how a child goes from a concrete thinker to an abstract thinker, or how he goes from not having object permanence to understanding object permanence.
问题是,他是否真的解释了,儿童思维是如何从具体向抽象转变的,或是真的解释了,儿童的客体永存性概念是如何从无到有的
But faced with the question what should he do, what did he want to do with his remaining couple of years, what he decided he wanted to do -- was finish his Yale degree-- thought he'd set himself the goal of graduating college before he died.
但面对着他该做什么这个问题,在他剩余的几年生命里他想要做的事,他所决定的他想要做的事,是完成他的耶鲁学位-,认为他想给自己设定在死之前,从大学毕业的目标。
应用推荐