We've looked at Milton's earliest poem, or what Milton wants us to think of as his earliest poem, from a couple of different perspectives.
我们已经看了弥尔顿最早期的诗歌,或者说弥尔顿希望我们认为是他最早的诗,从一些不同的角度。
It assumes that--William James assumes he's talking to males, male humans who sometimes take the perspective of male bears.
他体现在,威廉,詹姆斯,他在同男性讲话,男性有时,从公熊的角度思考。
But in another respect he seems to take the divine calling very seriously, ? right, I mean does he not?
但从另个角度看来,他对神明召唤似乎很认真,不是吗?
And just to give you a sense, if you do a cross-cut of this, you cannot show it from this angle, but it should really be sort of a dumbbell shape with the nodal plane in between the two nuclei.
告诉你们这些就是给你们点概念,假如你们把他横切切开,不能从角度上展示,但它还是会保留几分哑铃的形态,以及在两核之间的节面。
So, Achilles is not doing anything sort of illegal or unconstitutional, but he's doing something that's really out of line from a normal point of view.
阿喀琉斯并没做什么不合法律的行为,但从我们的角度来看,他的行为的确过分了
What Einstein then clarified for us was that we could also be talking about energies, and he described the relationship between frequency and energy that they're proportional, if you want to know the energy, you just multiply the frequency by Planck's constant.
爱因斯坦阐述的是我们,也可以从能量的角度来谈论,他描述频率和能量之间的关系,是成比例的,如果希望知道能量值,你用普朗克常数乘以频率就可以了。
He would study some person from a certain point of view.
他会从某个角度去审视一个人。
This is what he says in this first passage. He says: If we study speech from several viewpoints simultaneously, the object of linguistics appears to us as a confused mass of heterogeneous and unrelated things.
这也是他在第一篇文章里说的话:,我们同时从几个角度读这篇文章,这时语言学乱的像一锅粥,没有系统毫无关联性。
John Locke accounted for the rise of private property from the state of nature by a chain of reasoning very similar to the one that Nozick and the libertarians use.
洛克从自然状态角度,解释了私有财产的兴起,他的推理思路,和诺齐克等自由主义者的思路相似。
But, what was he really saying in a sense?
但从课程角度看,该如何解读他的设想呢?
So if all of these is perfectly understandable from the standpoint of Congressman Barney Frank, So is his recent statements that he wants the Fannie and Freddie to lower the lending standards to condos now.
所以如果这一切都是可以理解的话,从巴尼,富兰克林的角度看,他最近的言论,他希望房利美和房地美,降低购买高级公寓的借款标准。
He says, "Look, I try to picture the world--admittedly from the outside-- I try to picture the world in which I don't exist, I'm no longer conscious. I'm no longer a person, no longer experiencing anything.
他会说,你看,我试图从外界角度想象这个世界-,想象我不存在的这个世界,我不再具有意识,不再作为人存在,不再有任何经历。
JFK, when making the plea for equal rights, didn't produce an abstract philosophical argument but rather tried to invite his listeners who were white to engage in perspective taking.
当肯尼迪呼吁实行平等权利时,他并没有提出抽象的哲学理由,而请求那些听他呼吁的白人,从黑人的角度进行思考。
Because he sees it that way in the past.
是因为他此前曾从这个角度看过。
If so how? And once again he puts forward different arguments; in Book II chapter 8 he compares law to other arts and sciences and suggests why sciences such as medicine and has exhibited progress this should be true for law.
如果可以,如何改?同样地,他从不同的角度来推论;,在第,II,册第,8,章中,他对比法律,与其它的艺术与科学,并暗示像医学等科学都已显示进展,法律也理应如此。
应用推荐