It uses a language and a style that's very far from the language and style of later philosophy and abstract theology.
它运用的那种语言和风格,与后来的哲学及抽象神学的风格,大不相同。
people they've worked with in the past, so there are a lot of different sources.
他们之前的同事啦等等。所以,渠道各不相同。
So, there's no absolutes about this, this is a general response where all the features can be different with different pathogens.
这其中并没有明确的规律,免疫应答是普遍存在的,但针对不同的病原体的应答规律各不相同
Constant. Ooh, constant says, no matter what the length of the list is, I'm going to take the same amount of time.
这个算法用的时间是相同的,我不这么认为,如果我们创建一个十倍于以前大小的数组。
Well, you might think it's an empirical question, and in fact I am inclined to think it's an empirical question, varying from person to person.
你可能觉得这是个实证问题,我也倾向于认为它是实证问题,各人的情况各不相同。
Humans are not all born the same, with the same capacities, abilities.
人类从出生就不相同,没有相同的能力,才华
I won't end up at the same temperature.
但不结束在相同的温度。
But why don't I apply this same logic?
但为何不使用相同的逻辑呢?
The trouble is, you just don't know when that explosion took place, and since there are several periods in this general area that we're talking about now, in which something big happened, some great change takes place, it turns out different people want to have their explosion at different times.
问题是,你不了解火山爆发的,确切时间以及这种爆发,在这个区域又延续了很多个时期,这些时期发生了许多重大事件和重大变化,结果就是不同人对,火山爆发的时间推测各不相同
Does he not therefore as much accuse mankind by ?" his action as I do by my words?" You can see the mischievousness of Hobbes in that delightful passage. What about you, he says, and this is not in some kind of state of nature.
他在这些地方用行动攻击人类的程度,不正和我用文字攻击的程度相同吗,你们可以看出霍布斯在这一精彩段落里,的一丝顽皮,他说,你们怎么看呢,这和自然状态不同。
I think everyone loves Nike for different reasons, but... everything is,
我想每个人爱耐克的原因各不相同,但一切都能
When we talk about resonance structures, we're talking about cases that have the same arrangement of atoms the key is the atoms are the same, and the thing that is different is the arrangement of electrons here.
当我们讨论共振结构的时候,我们讨论的是原子排布相同情况,关键在于原子是相同的,不一样的只是电子排布。
It can come from animal sources and from vegetable sources, and the two have different impacts on health.
它可能来自动物,也可能来自植物,这两种对健康的影响各不相同
Neurons actually look quite different from one another but this is a typical one.
尽管神经元的外形各不相同,但这是一个典型的神经元
That also cannot happen, so they're moving with the same acceleration.
这也不可能发生,所以它们以相同的加速度运动
This much, by the way, Wimsatt has in common with Gadamer, because Gadamer doesn't talk much about authors either, and Gadamer is interested in what he calls meaning, the subject matter, die Sache. Right? He's not interested in your sort of expression of that meaning or my expression of that meaning.
顺便说一句,文萨特和葛达玛很大相同之处就在于,葛达玛也不太强调作者的作用,而是对文章的含义,主题感兴趣,不是吗?,他不关注作品在用,你的还是我的表达方式来表现内涵。
Objects can vary in terms of how beautiful they are.
它们美的方式各不相同
It says,same personality's good enough,as long as there's no branching.
它说有相同的人格就足够了,只要不存在分支。
And if we had more time we could spell out rival theories of well-being, which could be interestingly distinguished one from another in terms of how they answer the question, ?" "What's missing from the experience machine?"
如果我们有更多的时间,我们可以谈谈幸福的各种理论,有意思的是,它们各不相同,他们对这个问题的答案不同,即“体验机器里缺少了什么“
Just because it looks as though we can imagine it and just because it seems as though from the fact that we can imagine one without the other, it just won't necessarily follow that we really do have two things that are separate and not identical in the real world.
仅仅是因为我们似乎能够,想象到一个事物独立于,另一个事物存在这件事,并不能说明,在现实世界里,有这样两个,相互独立,而且不相同的事物
You need some of it because some of it gets converted into molecules called phospholipids, and phospholipids are different.
但你也需要一些甘油三酯,因为它们可以转化成磷脂分子,而磷脂又各不相同
Maybe in this world, minds and bodies are identical, even though in other logically possible worlds the identity comes apart.
也许在这个世界,心灵和身体就是相同的,即使在其他逻辑世界中,不存在这种同一性
And that's why, when I put up those three different reactions, and we saw the signs could vary.
这就是为什么,我写出了三个方程,但是能量和熵的符号却不相同。
Second thing we've got to worry about is, what's a basic step? All right, if I bury a whole lot of computation inside of something, I can say, wow, this program, you know, runs in one step. Unfortunately, that one step calls the Oracle at Delphi and gets an answer back. Maybe not quite what you want.
我们需要担心的第二件事情就是,什么该作为一个基本的步骤呢?,如果我把一大堆的计算过程放到里面,我可以说,噢,这个程序你知道的,一步就完成了,不幸的是,这一步可能要靠预言家才能得到答案,这可能跟你想要的结果不太相同吧。
And odds are if a week hence, two weeks hence just for fun you decide to reimplement your Scratch project -- or some tiny piece of it, it wouldn't be surprising -- or shouldn't be -- if you end of implementing the same game or animation or whatever using a completely different set of puzzle pieces Same deal we'd see here.
可能一周之后,两周之后,为了好玩,你决定重新实现你的Scrtch工程,或者其中一小部分,它将不会是令人惊讶的-,本来也不应该是--如果你运行相同的游戏,或者是动画,亦或是用完全不同的设置,来运行拼图游戏,我们将看到相同的处理。
That's why every-- development of every specific vaccine turns out to be different because they don't all follow exactly this kind of time course.
这就是为什么,每一种疫苗的发展都是不同的,因为疫苗诱导产生应答所需时间各不相同
People have to evolve to have biology that tolerates the subsistence that they access to, and that varies in different parts of the world, so again, humans evolve.
人类不得不演化,以适应周遭环境,世界各地环境各不相同,因此,人类再次演化
You'll recall that when we talked about the body view, I said the best version of the body view doesn't require the entire body, to be the same body,but the brain.
你们记得我们探讨肉体理论的时候,我说肉体理论的最好版本是,不需要整个相同的肉体,而是大脑。
应用推荐