You have one rule invoking another rule and then you can get a sentence like "Fred thinks Barney likes Wilma."

遵循调用前一个规则的这个规则,这样你就得到了,像"弗雷德觉得巴尼喜欢威尔玛",这样的句子

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

I mean that, that's an endemic problem. But, you know, I mean the rules are actually pretty simple.

那是一个地域性的问题。但是，这其实是非常简单的规则。

经常犯的失误 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

And if we're stuck with it,then of course it's not an objection against any one of the theories that uses it.

而且如果我们卡在了这里,任何一个理论适用这规则都无妨。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now, when you do this, how many-- and then so, for instance, you get the sentence "Fred likes Wilma."

你按照规则去做之后,比如说,你会得到一个句子,"弗雷德喜欢威尔玛"

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

The Taylor rule specifies specific variables and everybody at the markets would understand the rule, ? and that's correct, right?

像泰勒规则就明确了具体的变量,市场中每一个参与者也都能够理解，这个没错吧？

斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

All right. The rules, though, are, they can only move one disk at a time, and they can never cover up a smaller disk with a larger disk. OK. Otherwise you'd just move the whole darn stack, OK?

好，规则是，他们只能一次挪动一个盘子,并且不能把大盘子放在小盘子上,不这样的话你就直接,把这一堆盘子都挪过来了对不对？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

This isn't really a formal thing I put in place.

这不是一个正式的规则。

斯坦福公开课 - 扎克伯格谈Facebook创业过程课程节选

Remember we have to put one in each degenerate orbital before we double up on any orbital, so just keep that rule in mind that we would fill one in each p orbital before we a to the second one.

我们必须把,每一个放入简并的轨道,我们把每一个电子放在p轨道里，所以把规则记在脑子里,我们把每一个电子放在p轨道里,在我们放入第二个电子之前。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

And scholarship of the nineteenth century and most of the twentieth century is generally characterized by a deep-seated bias that views impurity rules as primitive and irrational taboos, and sacrifice as controlled savagery that's empty of any spiritual meaning.

十九世纪和二十世纪的大部分时期,学术界都有一个,很深层的偏见，那就是认为不纯的规则是,原始且无理的，献祭是野蛮人才干得出来的,无任何精神意义的活动。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

Like in popular music there's often a couple of verses and a chorus and a bridge and you can predict each different movement of the piece, and that's more regular than-- Couldn't say it better myself.

就像在流行音乐中有很多的曲段，副歌,和过渡乐节，这样你就可以预测到音乐的每一个变化，这样就比别的要规则-,光我一个人不好说太细。

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

If you live in a society that operates under those rules, then it should be up to the government to decide how those resources that come back through taxation are distributed because it is through the consent of the government.

如果你在一个按照上述规则运行的社会中生活，那么就应该由政府来决定,如何分配，通过征税收回的资源,因为那是政府一致表决通过的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

They took a crystal, this is a single crystal of nickel that has regular planes of atoms, and those planes are spaced on the order of an angstrom or less apart, and they irradiated this with x-rays.

他们取了个晶体,一个具有规则原子平面的，镍晶体,这些面间距差不多也是一埃或者更少，它们放射出X射线。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

So as I say,the soul theory can at least give us an answer that avoids the no branching rule.

所以我说，灵魂理论至少能给我们,一个避开无分支规则的答案。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We also need to follow Hund's rule, this is that a single electron enters each state before it enters a second state.

我们也需要遵从洪德规则，这是一个电子在进入第二个态之前,要进入每一个态。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So let's try to choose between the personality theory with the no branching rule and the body theory with the no branching rule.

让我们从带有无分支规则的人格理论,和带有无分支规则的肉体理论选一个。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And the way to read this rule is you make a sentence by taking a noun, any noun, putting a verb after it, and then following that verb with a noun.

这个规则的内容是,你这样来创造一个句子,用一个名词,任何一个名词,在名词后跟一个动词,再在动词后跟上一个名词

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

Which is, and we're going to do some examples of this, initially we just typed in expressions Python into the interpreter; that is,directly into Python And as I suggested last time, the interpreter is actually a program inside of the machine that is basically following the rules we're describing here to deduce the value and print it up.

也就是，我们将会对这一点讲解一些例子，一开始我们只是简单的把表达式输入,到解释器里面去，也就是直接传给,我上次跟大家讲过，解释器实际上是,机器内置的,按照我们描述的规则,来推算出结果值并把值显示出来的一个东西。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

We should call it E-flat and put it up on the E line because there's kind of rule here that you have to use up each letter name in turn, each letter name in turn.

我们应该称之为降E,把它放在E的谱线上,因为这算是一个规则,要依次使用每个字母,依次用每个字母

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

And one of the puzzles of syntactic rules, or one of the issues of them, is that different rules can conspire to create the same sentence.

语法规则的一个谜团或问题是,不同规则可以共同作用来产生同一个句子

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So we have two electrons in our bonding orbital, but because we use the same rules to fill up molecular orbitals as we do atomic orbitals, so the Pauli exclusion principle tells us we can't have more than two electrons per orbital, so we have to go up to our anti-bonding orbital here.

所以在成键轨道上有两个电子，但因为我们用了和原子轨道时,用的相同的规则，所以Pauli不相容原理告诉我们,一个轨道上不能有两个以上的电子，所以我们需要填充到反键轨道上去。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So, presumably, if we follow our rules so far only one of these should be correct.

那么，可以假定，如果我们按照之前的规则,应该只有一个是正确的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选