"I am here to protest what the government is doing to us, taking our freedoms away, spending way too much money, ramming these things down the throat of the people without their consent."

VOA: standard.2010.04.15

So, all right. Good. Are there any other defenders who say it's just categorically wrong, with or without consent?

很好，有没其他人要辩护的,谁认为就是绝对错的，不管有没征得同意？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

What is wrong with Locke's account of how private property can arise without consent?

洛克关于私有财产,无需他人同意就能产生这个观点，有何错呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

It can't exist as a force that conceives a human individual from the outside without that individual's consent because we all freely sin. No one can be compelled to do anything within the Miltonic theology of free will.

不存在那种不经人类同意就从外界,构造人类个体的力量,因为我们都自由地带着原罪，在弥尔顿自由意志的学说下,没有人被强迫做任何事。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference, that an act that would be wrong taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?

为什么征得了同意，就能在道德上如此不同呢，没有征得同意就杀人，在道德上是不允许的，征得同意就是允许的吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

On the one hand, he says the government can't take your property without your consent.

一方面，他说,未经你同意，政府不能取走你的财产。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

"And that no one can take from them without their consent."

即未经他们本人的同意，任何人无权夺去“

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

"The supreme power," By which Locke means the legislature, "Cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent, for the preservation of property being the end of government and that for which men enter into society, " it necessarily supposes and requires that people should have property."

最高权力“,这里洛克指的是立法机关，“未经本人同意，不能取去任何人财产的任何部分，因为，既然保护财产是政府的目的,也是人们加入社会的目的，这就必然假定而且要求人民应该享有财产权“

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选