Why call attention not so much to the difference between "few love her" and "none praise her" as the notion that none praise her?
他为什么要让大家注意到,“没有人赞扬她“和“几乎没有人爱她“,的区别呢?
But, in economic terms, there's no difference between losing the tickets and losing $400, so why do you behave differently?
但是,从经济学角度上看,丢了票和丢了400美元没有什么不同,但你为何会做出不同的反应呢?
I think we're fully entitled to ask why: why Milton waits for the last eight lines of his poem to tell us that there's a difference, that there's a difference between the poet and the speaker.
我们完全有权利问为什么:,为什么弥尔顿要等到诗的最后8行,才告诉我们这里的区别,这里诗人和演说人之间的区别。
But you see the difference. Great question, and a very important thing to understand, and that's why I'm belaboring this point, since this is where people tend to get pretty confused, and this is why mutation is very important to understand. Yeah.
但是你们已经发现区别了,这问题挺好的,并且有重要的一点需要我们去注意的是,人们经常对可变性这一点感到很迷惑,但是可变性是很重要的,我们需要理解它,这也是我经常强调这一点的原因。
Questions make a difference, which is why it is also important to ask the positive psychology question, which is the salutogenic question: ? "What is source of health? What is the source of success?
疑问引起改变,因此提问是非常重要的,提出积极心理学的问题很重要,也就是“健康创成“的问题:,“健康源于什么?成功源于什么?
应用推荐