Now, is there someone who can explain, those of you who are tempted by consent, can you explain why consent makes such a moral difference?
认为派克同意就属正当的,有没人能解释一下,为什么派克同意了,在道德上就有所不同呢?
Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference, that an act that would be wrong taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?
为什么征得了同意,就能在道德上如此不同呢,没有征得同意就杀人,在道德上是不允许的,征得同意就是允许的吗?
应用推荐