What's changing along here is the what's changing along this pathway is the expression pattern of genes in cells.

因此这里改变的是,在这条途径上改变的是,基因表达的模式

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

Well, well and good, but at the same time, if that's the case, and if there is this extraordinary emphasis on the importance of the expression of genius, you can see what's beginning to happen.

很好，但与此同时，如果过于重视那些,天才作家的表达，你可以看到它所引起的后果。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

In this book, what I wanna just hit home here, especially for those if you are watching this, is that spiritual life and religious expression is not something that you do once and then you're done.

这本书，我想重申它的精彩之处，观众们，在于告诉你们，精神生活和宗教表达,并不是一次就,可以完成的事儿。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

So the result is we can combine all of these as a single differential, and just like we've seen before, what that suggests is that we define another new quantity given by this expression.

结果就是我们能把所有的结果,整理成一个单一的微分，就像我们前面看到的一样，这说明我们可以利用这个式子,定义一个新的物理量。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

And to just give you a sense of what this is, the analytical expression that Heisenberg gave in one of its forms is that the uncertainty in the momentum a particle times the uncertainty in its position, this is the uncertainty.

给你说明一下什么是，分析的表述方式,海森堡给出的按照它的其中一种形式,那就是,粒子动量的不确定度乘以,位置的不确定度，这是不确定关系。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Now, with this in hand, what I want to do is, and in Firm 2 I have a similar expression, what I want to do is, I want to figure out the Nash Equilibrium of this game.

知道它了以后,因为公司2的表达式也是相似的,接下来我们就可以尝试找出纳什均衡了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So, in all of this, what he does is he makes, to use an expression that I've already used before in the context of absolutism, he makes the Boyars, while he's building his navy and expanding Russia, he makes the Boyar junior partners in absolutism.

所以,通过所有的这些事情,用我之前用过的一个词来形容,他使得波维尔们,当他在建海军和扩张领土时,他使得波维尔贵族臣服在他的绝对权威之下

耶鲁公开课 - 欧洲文明课程节选

So the best response for Player 1, as a function of what Player 2 chooses, q2, is just equal to the q1 hat in this expression and if I solve that out carefully, I will no doubt make a mistake, but let's try it.

这个就是参与人1的最佳对策,它是参与人2策略q2的一个函数,它和之前的q1帽那个表达式是相等的,虽然我是很仔细地计算的,还是有可能算错的,我来验证一下

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选