If that was the case, then disregarding, always disregarding, the facts about death might well be the appropriate response.

如果是这样的话，那无视，一直无视，关于死亡的事实可能是合适的回应。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, now I just want to point out that close reading can always be pushed farther.

现在我想指出,细读研究往往更加深入。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So you don't want to put in a negative energy, that's not going to help you out, you need to put in positive energy to get an electron out of the system. So that's why you'll find binding energies are always negative, and ionization energies are always going to be positive, or you could look at the equation and see it from there as well.

因为这对电离没有帮助,你需要一个正的能量,使得电子脱离这个系统,这就是为什么你会发现,结合能总是负的而电离能总是正的,或者你们看这个方程也可以发现这一点。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Well, the mean is always .2 no matter how many policies you write, so it's going to be--we're going to have a normal distribution centered on .2.

不论你签了多少份保单,均值永远是0.2,所以这就是一个关于x=0.2对称的,正态分布

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选