That would mean that we would have to find other ways to do things."
VOA: standard.2010.04.21
So here we're talking about v plus 1, so if we were to write it just for the neutral electron itself, we would find that the electron configuration is argon, that's the filled shell in front of it.
这里我们要分析的是正一价的钒离子,因此,我们先写出中性原子的电子排布,可以发现,其原子实是氩原子的电子排布,这些壳层已经被占满了。
Without worrying about the economics of it a second, how would we find that just as a math exercise?
不需要考虑经济学的理论,用数学的方法怎么来求解啊
Similarly, if we were to look at the radial probability distributions, what we would find is that there's an identical nodal structure.
相似地如果我们看看,径向概率分布,我们会发现有一个完全相同的波节结构。
So I'm gonna spend some time talking about examples that I think we would not find puzzling and walk our way back up to the case of personal identity.
我将会花点时间讲解,举一些大家不会感到疑惑的例子,不要让大家重新掉入,人格同一性的问题。
If we have an annual return that we're looking at, we can find a completely riskless asset with an annual return-- it would be a government bond that matures in one year.
如果我们可以查看各项资产的年度收益,我们可以找到一个零风险,且达到预期年度收益的资产项目-,也许是一年期的政府债券。
If we lowered the degree of synergy, what would happen to the effort level that we'd find by this method? What would happen?
如果我们降低了协同度,在这种情况下,结果会是什么样的呢
So again, what we're saying here is that it is most likely in the 3 s orbital that we would find the electron 11 and 1/2 times further away from the nucleus than we would in a around state hydrogen atom.
同样我们,这里说的是,氢原子3s轨道中,最可能找到电子的地方,是基态的11.5倍。
From here on down, if I bothered to do it, we'd find that choosing 3 always gets me 5% more of the vote than I would have had from choosing 2, against any of these higher numbers.
如果我不怕麻烦 我能一直这么写下去,我们发现选择立场3总是比选择立场2,使我多获得5%的选票,在对手选更靠后的立场的情况下
Well,in the same way,if we could find some behavior on our part that calls out for explanation, that the best possible explanation would be that at some level we don't believe we're going to die, then we might say,look, this gives us some reason to think that we don't really believe we're going to die, even though we say we believe it.
同样,如果我们发现自己有些行为有待解释,这最好的解释可能就是,在某种程度上,我们不相信自己会死,然后我们说,看,这让我们有理由相信,我们并不相信我们会死,即使我们口头上说相信。
You wouldn't be expected to be able to guess that this would happen, because using any kind of simple theory, we would, in fact, predict that this would not be the case, but what we find experimentally is that it's more stable to have half filled d orbital than to have a 4 s 2, and a 3 d 4.
你们不用预期有能力,猜出这个会发生,因为使用任一种简单的理论,我们事实上可以预测不会是那种情况,但是我们在实验中发现的,是半填充d轨道比,4s23d4更加稳定。
应用推荐