In the first game, it was kind of clear that we should choose Alpha and here it's not at all clear what we can do-- what we should do.

在第一个博弈里,我们很显然应该选α,但这次我们应该怎么选就很不确定了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We know, from the very first lesson of the class last time, that no one should choose these strategies.

从上堂课中,我们学到了,不要采用这类策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

How should we choose between these two views?

我们该如何在两个理论之间取舍？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Just as we said you should never choose a strictly dominated strategy, you're probably never going to choose a weakly dominated strategy either, but it's a little more subtle.

我们说过,不要采用严格劣势策略,你也不应该采用弱劣势策略,不过这个更严密一些罢了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

He's going to choose easy, so we should defend easy.

他会选择平坦之途,我们应该在此设防

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So certainly part of the problem here, with the reasoning I just gave you-- the reasoning that said I should choose Beta, because if we both reason the same way, we both do better that way-- involves some kind of magical reasoning.

那么说问题就出在了这里,就是之前我们说应该选β的问题,如果我们要都这么想,确实得到更好成绩,但这是有前提的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We know from last time that you should not choose a dominated strategy, and we also know we probably aren't going to choose a weakly dominated strategy, and we also know that you should put yourself in other people's shoes and figure out that they're not going to play strongly or strictly or weakly dominated strategies.

上节课我们学到了,不要采用劣势策略,然后今天我们学到了,我们有时可能不会选择弱劣势策略,我们还学会了站在别人立场上思考,然后推测出他们不会选择,严格劣势策略或弱劣势则略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So what we know here, we know that Player II should not choose right.

从中我们得出参与者II不应该选右

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选