"If you recall a claim was made by al-Qaida representative that they have done it and TTP also has made a claim that we have done it,".
VOA: standard.2010.01.09
Milton elaborates on this claim that we should read and prove anything we want, for we are sufficient to judge aright.
弥尔顿详尽阐明了这个论点,我们应该多读书,去求证自己想知道的所有事,因此我们才能够做正确的判断。
And from the titles we know he considered for this book, none of them make that claim "The Life of Richard Wright."
从他为书起的名字就能知道,没有人提议书名应该是《理查?莱特的一生》
Gadamer's claim, however, was that if we do that, we are in fact suspending the way in which it might be that they speak true.
然而,葛达玛认为,如果我们那样做,我们很可能放弃了一个,可能告诉我们事实的方向。
And from that to the further claim that whatever we mix our labor with that is un-owned becomes our property.
再从这更进一步为以下观点,任何施加了我们劳动的无主物品,都是我们的财产。
This is tremendously important because every Greek state that we know about made the claim that that's what it did.
这点极其重要,因为我们所知的每一个希腊政府,都是这样去做的
We give lip service to the claim that we're going to die, but at some level, we don't really believe it.
口头上相信我们会死一事,在某种程度上,我们并不真正相信。
It at least does corroborate the claim that merge sort N*log N as we argue intuitively is in fact, N log N in running time.
但这至少证实了归并排序,的时间复杂度为。
How are we to understand Socrates' claim that the pursuit of justice requires him ? to turn away from public to private life?
我们如何理解苏格拉底声称说,追求正义让他,从公共转向个人的生活?
So we have to ask now, now that my claim is, you can ask me any question you want about this particle and I can answer you.
现在我们要问,我的观点是,你可以问我任何关于,这个质点的问题,我都可以回答你们
And one claim, which we're going to return to briefly next class when we talk about language, is that there's a very, very big difference between a creature that doesn't have language and a creature that does.
我们下节课讲述语言时,会简单地讲述一个观点,也就是在未掌握语言的生物,与掌握语言的生物之间,存在着巨大的差异
If we had been thinking -- and some of us may well have been thinking and we were right to think provisionally -that Satan was a character that we could actually identify with, if we had been thinking that Satan was in any way a perfect character with some sort of justifiable claim -these thoughts are now being corrected by the means, by the mechanism, of the simile.
如果我们在思考--有些人已经在考虑这些问题,我们的确应该暂时想一想,-撒旦是一个的确可以,如果我们想过撒旦是,一个应当被公正对待的完美的角色的话,-这些想法目前已经得到了,这个机制和比喻的纠正。
It's one that we'll take up in greater detail, though, when we get to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is stressed to a greater degree than it is in Exodus, but for now, we can accept Levenson's claim that Sinai represents an intersection of law and love, because of the use of the suzerainty model.
这点占据了很细节的描述,当我们读到《申命记》,其中强调的程度比《出埃及记》要多得多,但是现在,我们只能接受Levenson的主张,那就是,西奈代表了律法与热爱的交叉点,因为用到了领主模式。
It's the product of a lot of luck and so we can't claim that they morally deserve all the money they make.
是有很多运气成分在内的,所以无法断言,在道义上他们的财富都是应得的。
Let me read you something as we move to the fulles claim that will be made for the role of the polis.
在我们全面阐释城邦的角色之前,我给你们读一些文字
So again,we don't have any clear, true interpretation of the claim that nobody can take my place, even with regard to dying.
所以我们还是没有一个清晰的,真实的关于没人能取代我的诠释,更不用说死亡了。
In fact, we have some claim, and a Roman writer later on, that there was a treaty back in the eighth century B.C.
实际上,之后一个罗马作家,写到过一些声明,公元前八世纪在埃维厄岛几个城邦之间
The best explanation of that behavior is to be found by claiming that at some level, at some fundamental level,we don't really believe what we claim to believe.
对那种行为最好的说明就是口头上相信,但在某种根本的程度上,我们并不相信它。
If he could show us, he could convince us that harmony is not really invisible, then we would no longer have a counterexample to the claim that the invisible can't be destroyed.
如果他可以说服我们,和声并非无形,那我们就没有了,灵魂不可毁灭,这一论断的反例。
That's the claim. We all die alone.
这种说法认为,我们都是独自地死去。
suppose we make for, the moment, the bold conjecture, the philosophical claim, that not only is pleasure and the absence of pain, not only is pleasure one good thing and pain one bad thing.
假设此刻我们做出大胆猜测,哲学声称,不仅只,快乐和没有痛苦,快乐不止是一样好的东西,痛苦不止是一样坏的东西。
And by now we've gone rather far afield in the search for an interpretation of that claim.
现在我们已经讨论得非常深入和广泛了。
Well,maybe the explanation is, although we give lip service to the claim that we're mortal, at some more fundamental level,we don't truly believe it.
也许这个的解释就是,纵然我们口头上说我们会死,在某些最根本的层面上我们其实并不相信。
So despite the fact that the claim we all die alone is one of these things that one hears, I think it's just nonsense.
所以虽然有说法不绝于耳,说我们都将孤独而死,我觉得这完全不值一提。
Remember,we're looking for a claim that says, that makes it true,that everyone dies alone.
记住,我们要探讨的说法是,每个人都是孤独而死的。
The noble families of Greece,and we see it already in Homer, typically claim descent from some god or other and ordinary people do not have that ability.
希腊的贵族家族,我们在荷马身上已看到了,典型地声称贵族权力由神祇所授予,并表示普通人没有那种能力
But against this there are those who think, no, in addition to thinking about the value of the content of life, we have to remember-- so these people claim--that life itself is worth having.
但是与此相反有些人认为,不,除了考虑生活的内容,我们还要记住-,生活本身是值得过的,这些人这样认为。
If,when we interpret the claim everyone dies alone, that just ends up being a slightly pretentious way of saying everyone dies, we might say,oh yeah,that is true and it is a necessary truth, but it's not especially surprising.
如果我们对每个人都孤独而死的诠释,只是装模作样地说明人终有一死,那我们会说,这是真理,也是必要的,但并没有什么好惊奇的。
but rather, is there any good reason to think that we're all or most of us are in that situation, are in that state of belief where, although we give lip service to the claim that we're going to die, is there any good reason to believe that fundamentally we don't actually believe it?
而是是否有好的理由认为,我们中全部或者大部分都处于,这样一种相信的状态,虽然我们都声称自己会死,是否有好的理由相信,我们其实根本不相信呢?
I think,as far as I can see,that the claim we all die alone, however we interpret it,just ends up being implausible or false.
在我看来,说我们全都会孤独而死,无论怎样解释都是不合理的,错误的。
应用推荐