It's one that we'll take up in greater detail, though, when we get to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is stressed to a greater degree than it is in Exodus, but for now, we can accept Levenson's claim that Sinai represents an intersection of law and love, because of the use of the suzerainty model.

这点占据了很细节的描述，当我们读到《申命记》,其中强调的程度比《出埃及记》要多得多，但是现在，我们只能接受Levenson的主张，那就是,西奈代表了律法与热爱的交叉点，因为用到了领主模式。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

And in many ways, we can understand human intellectual history just based on this idea: ? should we accept human nature?

在很多方面，我们能理解人类智力发展历史,仅仅基于这个观点：,应不应该接受人类本性？

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

Maybe you want to say, "You can't argue with that; we have to accept that.

不过你们也许会说：,“这是我们必须要去接受的;,没什么好争论的。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

Now, notice that if we accept this view to decide how well off I am, or somebody else is, you can't just add up the contents of the life.

请注意,如果用这种观点决定自己的幸福程度，或者其他人的幸福程度，你就不能单单把生活内容加起来。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And all we can do after we accept this nature is to first understand it through research, and then after we understand it, make the best use of it.

在接受这个本性后，我们唯一能做的,是通过研究首先来理解它，理解它后，好好地利用它。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

But how can we say that if we accept the soul theory?

但若接受灵魂理论又怎么能这么说呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

All right. That's what we can do if we accept hedonism.

好的，接受享乐主义的话就是这样。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Can we possibly accept the no branching rule?

我们可能接受无分支规则吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now the question is "how does it expand" and "why is it so difficult for us to understand, accept, assimilate and live according to the fact that we can make a difference, if we understand that what we need to understand is how change happens.

问题是“它如何扩大“,以及为什么我们难以理解，我们能够做出改变这个事实,并接受，被同化以及据此生活，如果我们能了解我们需要理解的,是改变如何发生。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选