• "But I don't accept the fact that, just because it takes insurgencies , that we're not at a point where it can't be turned, because I think it can.

    VOA: standard.2010.07.22

  • When, rather than trying to fight or defeat our nature, we accept it.

    不是想办法战斗打败我们的本性,我们接受它。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • We accept it and we create games around it.

    我们接受它,并利用它发明游戏。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • OK, so far though, I've just shown you what happens inside a peace a code. It raises an exception. It goes to that accept clause. We don't have to use it just inside of one place.

    好了,我已经给你们看了,代码内部发生了什么,它报了一个异常,然后就到了处理的片段,我们不该就在一个地方用它。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • It's a tricky way how do you impose your ideas and how do we accept other ideas. -Absolutely.

    这挺奇妙的,怎样向别人推销自己的观点,而我们本身又是如何接受别的观点的,-的确如此。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • We have to understand the way in which it's something that, if we're going to accept this point of view, we need to live with.

    我们需要理解的是,如果我们接受某一观点,它就会如影随形地跟着我们。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • And if we are not willing to accept that implication, it seems as though we need to reject the soul theory of personal identity.

    如果我们不愿,接受这种结论,似乎,我们就需要拒绝承认,人格同一性的灵魂论。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • From then on,if you accept the analysis and the assumptions or the estimates that underlie it, then we pretty much know how to construct portfolios.

    如果你们理解了整个分析过程,假设前提以及各项资产的有关估算,就能知道该怎样建立一个投资组合

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • We may not accept their answers and it's very likely that we do not but their questions are often put with a kind of unrivaled clarity and insight.

    我们可能不接受他们的解答,我们可能接受才怪,但他们的问题常隐含一种,无敌的清晰与独到见解。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • It's one that we'll take up in greater detail, though, when we get to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is stressed to a greater degree than it is in Exodus, but for now, we can accept Levenson's claim that Sinai represents an intersection of law and love, because of the use of the suzerainty model.

    这点占据了很细节的描述,当我们读到《申命记》,其中强调的程度比《出埃及记》要多得多,但是现在,我们只能接受Levenson的主张,那就是,西奈代表了律法与热爱的交叉点,因为用到了领主模式。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • And sooner we accept it, the better.

    我们越早接受越好。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • And it seems that if we accept the body view, we have to say being a person is not an essential property of being something like me.

    似乎如果我们接受了肉体理论,就必须说作为一个人,并不是作为我的基本性质。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Or is human nature flawed maybe something we don't like ? but we need to accept it and work with it?

    还是尽管我们不喜欢人性中的缺陷,也必须接受它?

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • So I don't necessarily accept all my irrational thoughts and again, we'll talk about it much more next week of how we can cognitively reframe what we were thinking.

    我没有必要接受,所有不理智的想法,下周我们会更深入地探讨,如何认知性地重塑自己的想法。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • And all we can do after we accept this nature is to first understand it through research, and then after we understand it, make the best use of it.

    在接受这个本性后,我们唯一能做的,是通过研究首先来理解它,理解它后,好好地利用它。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • And we pay a very high price for this inability, for this refusal to accept the fact that it is part of human nature that is constrained, that is there no matter what.

    我们为这种无能付出高昂代价,为拒绝接受,本性受约束,生而有之的事实,付出高昂代价。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

  • But in the meantime it's probably on this occasion, once we accept them both as having come under the influence of the same form of linguistic thinking, to say a little bit about the similarities and differences that exist between Derrida and de Man.

    但同时在这种场合下可能,一旦我们接受这俩概念,在受到同样的语言学思想的影响后,我们就能看到一些,德里达和德曼之间存在的相同点和不同点。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Now the question is "how does it expand" and "why is it so difficult for us to understand, accept, assimilate and live according to the fact that we can make a difference, if we understand that what we need to understand is how change happens.

    问题是“它如何扩大“,以及为什么我们难以理解,我们能够做出改变这个事实,并接受,被同化以及据此生活,如果我们能了解我们需要理解的,是改变如何发生。

    哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定