-
He is clear about that. But then he goes on to say, and that's the natural right to property.
他非常明确这点，但之后他又说，而且财产权是自然权利。
-
I can't dispose of my life or my liberty or my property in a way that violates my rights.
我不能放弃自己的生命或自由或财产,因为某种程度上说，这侵犯了我的权利。
-
And his basic rights were seen to be absolute, for nothing must interfere with the right of each individual to defend his life, liberty, and property.
人的基本权利被视作每个个体都绝对拥有的,任何事物都无法干涉的,自卫,自由,财产的权利
-
The answer is that he can, and actually does, hold property in his fellow, all over the world, in a variety of forms, and has always done so."
但是事实上他可以,他完全有权利,把他的奴隶当作财产,甚至在全世界范围,不管以何种形式,他一直是那么做的
-
How do I give up my right to do whatever is in my power to secure my person or my possessions, when I have no expectation, you might say, ? that others around me are prepared to do so as well?
我怎么能在我不期望,身边的人会这样做的时候，放弃我保护自身和财产安全，不受侵害的权利？
-
But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights, if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
但这些人类法律合法的唯一前提,就是尊重我们的自然权利，尊重我们不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权。
-
How can there be a right to private property even before there is any government?
但私有财产权利怎么能在,政府建立之前就产生呢？
-
So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights, can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
所以即使多数人掌权，多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利，不能侵犯你基本的生命，自由和财产权。
-
Why is the fundamental right to religious liberty different from the right Alex asserts as a fundamental right to private property and to keep what I earn?
为什么宗教信仰权这一基本权利,不同于亚历克斯主张的,私有财产权，和保有自己财产的基本权利？
-
Property is natural in one sense but conventional in another.
财产既是自然权利，但也有约定俗成的一面。
-
But what about the part of 138, if you keep reading, "Men, therefore, in society having property, they have such a right to the goods, " which by the law of the community are theirs."
但继续读下去，138节后面部分又如何呢，“因此，在社会中享有财产权的人们，对于那些根据社会的法律，是属于他们的财产，就享有这样一种权利“
-
The right to property is a natural right in the sense that it is prepolitical.
财产权某种意义上可以说是,先于政治的自然权利。
-
So one answer to the question is why can't I give up my natural rights to life, liberty, and property is well, they're not, strictly speaking, yours.
第一个答案解释了为什么我们不能放弃,我们的生命，自由和财产权利，因为严格来说，它们不是自己的。
-
It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.
自然权利是说财产权是基本的不可剥夺的,正因为它是这样的权利，所以有产权制度存在，并被政府所尊重。
-
And when Locke speaks about the right to property, he often uses that as a kind of global term for the whole category, the right to life, liberty, and property.
洛克所说的所有权，通常概括了所有的自然权利，即生命，自由和财产权。
-
" This nobody has any right to but himself."
政府论》第五章第27节，“论财产“,除他以外任何人都没有这种权利“
-
If the majority rules that there should be taxation, even if the minority should still not have to be taxed because that's taking away property, which is one of the rights of nature.
即使多数人规定应当征税，少数人仍并不一定非要交税,因为那等于夺走少数人的财产，而财产权是自然权利之一。
应用推荐