This is what Tynjanov says: In formalist historiography, the prime significance of major social factors is not at all discarded.
提尼亚诺夫这样说:,在形式主义者编写历史时,并没有完全忽略主要社会力量的重要性。
How does that happen? You know, you've got to appeal to social forces if you're going to talk about change.
这是怎么回事?,谈到这个变化,我们必须要理解社会中的力量。
Milton's power was primarily seen as social and political and cultural.
弥尔顿的力量最初被看作是社会,政治,文化上的。
So technology is a powerful force in our society and I respect power of this kind.
科技是我们社会里一股强大的力量,我很敬畏这种力量
Obviously, it goes without saying that today the assessment of Milton as some kind of imminent social threat or some sort of social force in terms of the radical nature of political power - that has taken a sharp turn.
显然--这是不言而喻的--现在,这一种基于弥尔顿,政治力量的激进性而把他看做是,危险的社会威胁或社会力量的观点,已经有了180度大转弯。
A writer like Mary Astell can employ Milton's revolutionary rhetoric to advance a cause to which John Milton himself would of course ; have had difficulty subscribing; a dead Milton could exercise a social power that had nothing whatsoever to do with the living Milton's own social views.
一个像玛丽·阿斯苔这样的作者可以用弥尔顿的革命性语言,来推动一项事业,一项约翰·弥尔顿本人当然很难,赞同的事业;,死去的弥尔顿竟然能够操纵与生前弥尔顿的社会观点,毫无关系的社会力量。
It would drive us into such baroque circumlocutions and avoidances of the obvious to say, "Oh, social factors have nothing to do with this," that we might as well just sort of--not give the distinction up, because I think it's very important always to have it in the back of our minds.
它会给我们带来大量的冗余的表达,并且很明显,它和社会力量有很大关系“,我们会倾向于忽视这种区别,但是我们还是要重视这种区别,因为我觉得。
应用推荐