That's not just a set of functions--variables, as one might say in the lab.It's produced by genius.
它不仅仅只是一套机器,像人们在实验室所见的一样多变,它是由天才创作的。
But Descartes said that can't be because there are things that humans do that no machine could ever do.
但是笛卡尔否定了这一观点,因为有些事情,人类可以做到,机器永远不可能做到
One possibility, of course, is, why not say that people are just robots as well and we get our commands from outside?
当然有一种说法是,为什么不说人类也是,也是由外部指令控制着的机器人呢
And inside of the machine, and things we'll talk about, there is a process that will allow that sequence to be executed as described in that recipe, so it can behave like any thing that I can describe in one of those recipes.
在机器里面,还有我们要说的,里面有一个我们允许的,在方法中描述的,将要被执行的序列的过程,因此它可以像我在方法之中,描述的任意一种那样来表现。
There is a kind of internal irony here, I think because Hobbes sometimes writes as if, as we've seen, as if human beings are nothing more than complex machines that mechanically obey the laws of attraction and repulsion.
但我想这儿似乎存在着一种讽刺,因为霍布斯笔下的人,似乎就只是一具复杂的机器,只知机械地遵循法律所允许和不允许的事,这点我们在前面已有所耳闻。
There's a robot in those books, Marvin, who's --depressed, I think is the simple word about it.
书中有一个叫马文的机器人,我想可以用"消极"一词来概括他的特点
A different response, of course, is why couldn't we have robots that just build more robots?
另一种不同的回应,为什么我们不能拥有制造机器人的机器人呢
One man in Australia a couple of years ago was under the delusion that his father was replaced with a robot and cut off his head.
几年前一名澳大利亚人由于幻想他的父亲,变成了机器人而将他父亲的头砍了下来
And the thought, of course, is that the robot or the computer is a deterministic system and you can't have free will if you're a deterministic system.
那个想法,当然,是说机器人和电脑只是一种决定论的系统,而如果你是个决定论系统的话,就不可能有自由意志
Which is, and we're going to do some examples of this, initially we just typed in expressions Python into the interpreter; that is,directly into Python And as I suggested last time, the interpreter is actually a program inside of the machine that is basically following the rules we're describing here to deduce the value and print it up.
也就是,我们将会对这一点讲解一些例子,一开始我们只是简单的把表达式输入,到解释器里面去,也就是直接传给,我上次跟大家讲过,解释器实际上是,机器内置的,按照我们描述的规则,来推算出结果值并把值显示出来的一个东西。
It's pretty clear that there are lots of machines that it doesn't seem natural to ascribe beliefs or desires or goals or reasoning to.
很显然对于很多种机器来说,讨论它们的信仰,欲望,目标或论证,是一件很不自然的事
And so it doesn't seem plausible to suggest that we people must not be physical, merely physical, because after all, we can reason and no machine can reason.
所以,人不是物理对象,这一观点似乎并不能站稳脚跟,因为毕竟,我们人能推理而机器不能
I mean, after all from the physicalist's point of view, we're just a kind of glorified robot, able to do all sorts of things that most robots in most science fiction movies can do.
我的意思是,根据物理主义者的观点,人只是一种"高级"的机器人,能做到大多数科幻电影里,大多数机器人所能做到的事
Because whenever I tell this story now, people start saying, " "Oh, well the evil machines are busy using your body as a battery" or whatever it was in the movie, right?
因为现在我一讲这个故事,人们就会说,“邪恶的机器忙着把你的身体当电池“,不管电影是怎样刻画的了?
So that when you are hooked up to the machine, it seems to you exactly the same on the inside as it would seem to you if you really were-- and now fill in the blank.
当你被连接到机器上时,你的内心感受,看似就是你真正的体验-,哪一种体验都可以。
When you're on the experience machine, you've got-- your brain is being stimulated in such a way that you've got the identical experience on the inside to what it would feel like if you really were doing these things.
当你在体验机器上时-,你的大脑受到的刺激,让你在机器里获得,和真正做那些事时一模一样的体验。
When we think of the kinds of examples of material machines that we've got available to us in the fourteenth century, I try to imagine what would somebody in the fourteenth century think to himself or herself when he entertains the possibility that a plant might just be a machine?
当我们回想14世纪时期的,各种机器,我试着想象,一个生活在14世纪的人,他,或她,在面对一株植物可能,只不过是一台机器的观点时会怎么想
In fact, a French disciple of Hobbes in the next century, a man named La Mettrie, wrote a treatise very much following in the lines of L'Homme Machine Hobbes called L'Homme Machine, " or literally, Man a Machine.
实际上,在下个世纪霍布斯有一个法国的继承者,叫La,Mettrie,他写了一篇论文,在文字上紧紧跟随霍布斯的风格,题目叫,字面上理解,就是“人是机器。
And robots, the objection goes, are programmed; they necessarily follow their program.
而且这一反驳指出,机器人是被编程的,机器人必须遵照程序做事
应用推荐