So suppose that we consider a deviation in which, and again I've forgotten your name in which Stacy stands as well.

假设我们考虑一种偏差的情况下,我又忘了你的名字了,斯泰西也参选了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Stacy's going to pick up the right wing votes, she's going to split.

斯泰西会拿到些右派的选票,她会分得

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if Stacy stands, it doesn't make any difference she just loses.

那么如果斯泰西参选,不会有什么不同,她会输

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Conversely, If Beatrice doesn't stand and the woman who's one in from the side there, sit down a second Stacy and if this person stands, and your name is?

反过来,如果比阿特丽斯没有参选,那边的女士,斯泰西请坐,如果这个人站起来,你的名字是

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Why isn't it a profitable deviation for Stacy?

为什么对斯泰西来说它不是个有利的偏离

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So is this a profitable deviation for Stacy?

这对斯泰西来说是个有利的偏差吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Stacy, just stand a second.

斯泰西,站起来一会

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The moderate right wing votes she's going to split with Claire Elise, and jean's going to have all the left wing votes, extreme and moderate, and so from Stacy's point of view this is a double bad.

温和的右派选票会被她,和克莱尔·伊莉斯分享,吉恩将会获得所有的左派选票,极端的和温和的,因此从斯泰西的角度看这是加倍的差

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选