Are you supporting your claims? If you have very few quotations, chances are you are not. So, think of this lecture, as I go through it, as a kind of model.

你在支持你的论点吗，你有没有引用，很可能你并没有，所以，把这节课，当做是个模式例子。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

So in Milton's argument against licensing, the coexistence of so many conflicting opinions and beliefs.

所以在弥尔顿反对出版许可的论点中，他支持很多不同的观点和信念的共存。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

He's willing to entertain arguments, both for and against the debate.

他愿意接受辩论，无论是支持或反对的论点。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Again and again and again he quotes Levi-Strauss in confirmation of his own arguments, only then in a way to turn on him by pointing out that there is something even in what he's saying there that he hasn't quite thought through.

他一遍又一遍地引用列维，斯特劳斯的观点,来支持自己论点，在批驳其论点时也只是指出,他在某点上,考虑不够全面。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

He positions pro-censorship argument alongside anti-censorship rhetoric or metaphor, and there are dozens of moments in which it's just these opposites that are being asked to coexist in some kind of peace.

他把支持控制出版的论点和反对控制出版的修辞和,比喻放在一起，有无数次这样的对立,被要求和平共处在一起。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选