This region seems to respond the prices that seem exorbitant, and seems to predict that you're not going to buy something.
这一区域的活动似乎是认为价格太过离谱,因此预测受试者可能不会作出购买选择。
It's as if Milton were paralyzed, almost, at this moment in his choice between these various alternatives.
弥尔顿似乎被麻痹了,在他在几个可行性中作出选择的时候。
And that's essentially what we saw people have more nucleus accumbens activation priority choice " they are more likely to choose that stock.
这就是我们得到的结果,在作出选择时,受试者的伏隔核活动越多,他们就越有可能选择“股票。
Who else can find a way of reconciling the reaction of the majority in these two cases?
还有谁能来为两种情况中,大多数人的不同选择作出合理解释?
As you develop, as you're educated, you retain all those potentials for a certain point and then you make choices and you lose some of those potentials.
随着你的成长,随着你受的教育的增加,你某种程度上一直保留着所有这些潜能,然后你作出选择,并且失去一些潜能
And of course that means you have a judgment call.
这意味着你要作出选择。
So, studies with police officers using reaction time in split-second choices on who to shoot find that your stereotypical attitudes play a huge role in who you're likely to shoot when they're holding an object in their hand that's unclear.
一些针对警察的研究,用霎间的反应时间让他们作出选择,应该向谁开枪,研究发现这些刻板态度,能极大的影响你选择向谁开枪,当他们手里拿着不明物体时。
Or are you going to say that that will only take us so far, and it's the conditions that are messed up, and we have to do something about the conditions to make it easier for people to make healthier choices?
还是认为上述做法见效甚微,问题关键在于混乱的饮食环境,我们应该先改善周遭环境,使得人们更容易作出更为健康的选择
So either way, you're making a choice.
所以不管怎样,你都是在作出选择。
And the activation in another area of the brain, the interna insula that would help us to put the oppisite choice of the bond running away from risk.
而大脑中另一区域的活动,即岛叶内部活动,可以帮助我们作出相反决策,即选择“债券“来远离风险。
Now today I'm gonna focus on is what is happening in the center's posterior in your brain, and can it help us to predict what you're about to choose.
今天我的重点,是大脑中央后回中的活动,及其能否帮助我们对受试者的选择作出预测。
应用推荐