For a real gas it depends on more than the temperature STUDENT: Are there any other constraints similar to that .
而对实际气体,这是不对的,它的内能不仅仅依赖于温度,学生:有其他,类似的约束吗?
But it's not quite true, because typically what they actually do that, is they say it's adjusted for risk.
但是这是不对的,因为它们实际上就是存在这种情况,它们会根据风险进行调整。
I don't want somebody opening up a clamshell with some hot food in it. It's not right. It's not right.
我不希望任何人打开一罐蛤壳,里面装着热的食物,这不对。
Yes. I'm glad you actually asked me about that because, as I said it, I realized it wasn't quite right.
很好,非常高兴你能问我这个问题,因为我之前说过这话,但我认识到这话是不对的
We can work it out at home and check it carefully, but this isn't that incorrect.
大家回家后可以仔细画一下,但并非意味着黑板上的不对
So this is kind of a misinterpretation of that idea.
说的有点不对。
Well, what Thersites had done that was wrong, of course the poet and Odysseus didn't like his policy suggestion, but he had no right to speak at all.
诚然,书中认为忒尔西忒斯的做法是不对的,显然诗人和奥德修斯不喜欢他的政策建议,但他却根本连发言的权利都没有
John? - It violates property rights. It's wrong.
约翰呢,-他侵犯了财产权,所以是不对的。
Most of those people know they shouldn't.
大多数人知道这样做是不对的
Maybe I was wrong in suggesting that.
也许我这么说是不对的。
Right? We need a big sound here.
对不对,我们需要宏大的声音
That will be a mistake.
那样是不对的
I was hoping for a simpler answer, which is, just run it. Which is, yeah I know, seems like a dumb thing to say, right?
我希望一个简单点儿的答案,比如说去运行它吧,这方法看起来挺笨的对不对?
Now. You might look at that and say, well that's just a lot like what we had over here Right? We had some additive constant plus a simpler version of the same problem reduced in size by 1.
现在你可能会看着这个说,这很像我们以前做过的,对不对?我们用一些附加的常量,加上问题的另外一个规模缩小了1的,简化版本来代替这个问题本身。
Ah, n times, because for each value of i, I'm going to do that m thing, n*m so that is, close to what you said, right?
因此这就和你说的差不多了对不对?,这个问题的复杂度为,让我写下来,是-对不对,是?
And that does two things: bug one, it helps catch bugs in your code, and secondly it often converts it into a more efficient sequence of instructions before you actually go off and run it. All right?
这有两点好处:,第一是可以帮助你发现程序中的,第二是把你的代码,在运行之前,转换为更有效率的指令的集合,对不对?
And when I do this test, what I want to do, is say I'm going to pick the middle spot, and depending on the test, if I know it's in the upper half, I'm going to set my start at the mid point and the end stays the same, if it's in the front half I'm going to keep the front the same and I'm going to change the endpoint.
如果我知道目标数可能,再比中值点大的区间里,我可能就会把开始点设为中值点,而尾点不变,如果在小的那个区间里,就保持开始点不变而把尾点设为中值点,你们可以看到这儿的代码,就是这么做的,对不对?它是怎么做的?
What else is the flaw? Where's the flaw in this logic?
还有什么不对的地方,逻辑上还有什么错误?
And by the way, I mean all the test results.
不仅仅是不对的那些结果。
There's a lecture I've given several times at hospitals, to doctors, on doing diagnosis of complex multi illnesses. And I go through it and almost the same kind of stuff I'm going to talk to you about, about debugging.
一个实验室内的实验,为什么实验不对呢?,我也在医院给医生关于,诊断复杂的多种疾病做过很多讲座,我想了想,那和我给你们讲的,关于调试其实都是一回事。
It's like I'm doing this, right?
我就是这么做的对不对?
That's what we just did there, right?
也就是我们刚刚学到的对不对?
Yeah. Is the last one there?
对数级复杂度的算法的优势对不对?
Seems pretty obvious, right?
是这样的,对不对?
PROFESSOR: Yeah, comparing values, right?
教授:对了,用来比较值的,对不对?
We know that's not true.
我们知道那是不对的。
Good; so what Clara Elise is saying--it's an important idea-- is this and tell me if I'm paraphrasing you incorrectly is no matter what the other person does, no matter what the pair does, she obtains a higher payoff by choosing Alpha.
克莱拉?埃莉斯得意思是,要是我转达的不对请提示我,不管别人怎么选,不管她对手选了什么,她选α总会得到最优的成绩
The check needs to be somewhere in the program, but this is not the right place for it.
这个check必须出现在程序中,但是放在这儿是不对的。
People can get hung up on sort of hunting these things down, and stamping them out, one at a time. And it's a little bit like playing Whack-a-Mole. Right?
我们可能会一次一个的去发现,这个bug并且消灭它,这有点像打鼹鼠对不对?,不停的有鼹鼠跳起来?
I take the difference in the x-values, squared, the difference in the y-values, squared, add them up, take the square root of that.
好,是毕达哥拉斯定力对不对?,求x坐标的差,然后平方,求y坐标的差,然后平方,把它们加起来,开平方。
应用推荐