So again, for both heat and work we don't get the same result. Now let's look at our special function, right. So here's path A.
所以,再一次说明,对于热量和功,我们得到的结果是不同的,现在让我们看看我们的特殊函数。
If you get, you know, a handshake or you know. Every once in a while we get people to do that.
但如果能得到观众的一次握手,我们得到的就是观众。
Again we have the charge of the nucleus on plus 2, +2 but let's say this time the electron now is going to be very, very close to the nucleus.
对于我们的氦原子,我们有一次得到了原子核电荷量为,但是我们说这次电子。
I've got a list, walk you through it an element at a time, do I look at each element of the list more than once?
你一次只能得到他的一个元素,我是不是把数组里面的每个元素,都过了大于等于一次?,你不这样认为么?大家有什么建议?
National Public Radio asked exactly this question in a survey a year or so ago and they got the following principal responses back.
国家公共广播电台问过,完全相同的问题,在一次一年前的民意调查中,他们得到了如下的回复
I have the freedom to pass that person because I like the trend. Suppose I have somebody else who came here with two years of chemistry in high school, got a 95 on the first test, 70 on the second test, failed the third test, failed the final, has an aggregate score of 48.
我能够选择让那人通过,因为我喜欢他的进步,假设另一个同学,学了2年的化学在高中,第一次测试得到95分,第二次70分,第三次没通过,期末考也没通过。
And when I threw those away, I was left once again with a little box, and I could do it again, and again, and again.
剔除之后,我得到了更小的方格,我可以一次一次的重复这个过程
And the idea, again, is the kids who don't get rewarded say to themselves, "Well, I just spent time doing it, it must have an intrinsic value," while the children who get rewarded say, "I did it for the sticker. I did it for the toy.
再一次,没有得到奖励的孩子心里想,“我花了时间来做这件事,它一定是有内在的价值的”,而拿到奖励的小孩会说,“我是为了贴纸和玩具才做的”
What I want you to see is, because I've got two versions of that problem.
我展开一次得到了问题的两个版本,然后接下来是四次。
Seems like we've got everything you could possibly want to describe in a game.
看起来我们好像得到了,进行一次博弈所需的所有的要素
应用推荐