You've read all of one essay and you've read part of another, "Differance," and you've found him very difficult.
一整篇论文和另一篇论文的一部分,《延异》,大家已经发现了,德里达的作品很难懂。
Now, for those of you who have read Mill already, how, according to him, is it possible to draw that distinction?
现在,已经读过穆勒名著的同学,来说说他是怎样对此进行区分的?
As a teacher of mine used to say "You read Plato your way " I'll read him his way."
如同我一位老师常说的,“你们以你们的方式阅读柏拉图,我会以他的方式来阅读他“
The essay that you read was produced at the behest of his French publisher. They wanted him to write something that would make people feel better about the book, that would give some account of its origin and give some defense for its publication and its content.
你们所读到的那篇短文就是在法国出版商的要求下写的,他们希望他写些什么来让人们对这本书产生更多的好感,来交待这本书的缘起,并且为它的内容和它的出版进行辩护。
He heads up the Yale endowment -or the investment of the Yale endowment -and I have a New York Times article on the syllabus, just sort of a biography of him you could read.
他是耶鲁大学捐赠基金...,他是耶鲁大学捐赠基金的投资总监,大纲中有一篇纽约时报的文章,是他的传记,可以读一下
Let's listen to an erhu play a melody by a traditional Chinese composer— we call him in English "Abbing" and you can read about him there in your textbook.
让我们听听一段二胡旋律吧,它由一位中国早年的作曲家创作,英语中我们称呼他Abbing,当然,课本上有他相关的信息
应用推荐