So you don't think the idea of implied consent is strong enough to generate any obligation at all to obey the government?
就是说你认为默认同意的观点,并没有强到,足以让人有服从政府的义务?
Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think or not?
那如果派克的确同意了,你觉得杀他是正当的吗?
If you take newborn babies-- It's very hard to do research with newborn babies actually because of the consent procedure and everything, so most of this work is done in France, where they have no laws at all.
如果你去找些新生儿,由于知情同意书以及其他的问题,研究新生儿实际上是非常困难的,因此大部分的研究都是在法国进行的,因为法国并没有任何与此有关的法规
Now, is there someone who can explain, those of you who are tempted by consent, can you explain why consent makes such a moral difference?
认为派克同意就属正当的,有没人能解释一下,为什么派克同意了,在道德上就有所不同呢?
Now, you may not think that implied consent is as good as the real thing.
不过你可能认为默认的同意不如白纸黑字的协议。
You want to withdraw your consent and return to the state of nature.
想收回你的同意,转而回到自然状态。
You don't think that even with consent it would be morally justified?
你认为即便是派克同意了,这在道德上也是不正当的?
Otherwise,it would be kind of coerced consent under the circumstances,you think.
否则,考虑到当时情况,他可能是被迫同意的。
I'm wondering if Dudley and Steven had asked for Richard Parker's consent in you know, dying, if that would exonerate them from an act of murder and if so, is that still morally justifiable?
我想知道达德利和斯蒂芬斯,是否征得过派克的同意,取他的性命,是否那样就能赦免他们的谋杀罪名,是否这样,道德上就是正当的?
Well, because you didn't actually consent to it.
因为谁都没有真正同意过啊。
I want to hear now, finally, from those of you who think even with consent, even with a lottery, even with a final murmur of consent by Parker, at the very last moment, it would still be wrong.
我现在想听听,是否有人认为,即便是征得了同意,即便是有了抽签,即便派克最终还是答应了,杀死派克依然还是错误的。
But what I'm trying to get at is do you consider that you are under no obligation, since you haven't actually entered into any act of consent, but for prudential reasons, you do what you're supposed to do according to the law?
但我想知道的是,你认为自己,不负有任何义务,因为你并未真正作出任何形式的同意,只是出于谨慎考虑,你还是会依法缴税,是吗?
应用推荐