Any thoughts? Don't you hate professors who stand here waiting for you to answer, even when they have candy?
你们难道不讨厌站在那儿等你回答问题,的教授么?虽然他有糖果做奖品哦,用少于线性时间完成可能么?
Now do that in a sound byte on a national radio station when you got two minutes to answer.
这时你就得为全国听众一字一句地,在两分钟时间内解答这个问题
4 So even if the correct mathematical answer is 1.4 or whatever, when you divide an int by an int, you only have room in that variable, in the response for an actual integer.
所以即使那个正确的答案是4,或别的数值,当你用一个整型数除以一个整型数,在那个变量的返回值里,只有,存储一个整型数的空间。
So, when you divide by the mass to get the acceleration, you get the same answer.
因此,当等号两边除以质量来求加速度时,结果是相同的
And we must know what the result is supposed to be. Typically when you run an experiment, you say, and I think the answer will be x.
这样我们可以来查看代码的进程,我们还必须清楚结果应该是怎么样的,比如当你运行一个实验的时候。
something like that it's not wild enthusiam except actually, the answer to that question ' "when you asked 'did you love this person Avenon'," "he doesn't name that proposed marriage will to you."
诸如此类,这不是野性的狂热,实际上,问题的答案揭晓的时刻,当你问到'你爱阿瓦南吗“,他没有向你提到设想中的婚约“
Well, for the answer to that we have to go back to ancient Greek music theory, and when you read about this--it's really turgid stuff-- but believe it or not, I teach a course on this at the graduate level.
这个,要回答那个问题,恐怕要追溯到古希腊的音乐理论,每次读这些都会云山雾罩的,不管你信不信,我曾在研究生中开过这个课程
Well, one way of course is to accept the objection and say " "You're right Death isn't really bad for me " And some philosophers have indeed accepted that very conclusion, maybe Epicurus Most of us want to say " "No, no Death is bad for me" So we need a better answer to the ?" "Oh yeah? When is it bad for you?"
一种方式当然是接受它并说,“你是对的,死亡对我来说真的没什么坏处“,而一些哲学家确实接受了,那个结论,也许比如伊壁鸠鲁,我们大多数人想说,“不,不,死亡对我来说有坏处“,于是我们需要一个更好的答案来回答,“是么?,它什么时候对你有坏处了“
The result is that when you divide an int by an int, the answer no matter what is going to be an int.
当你把一个整型数除以一个整型数时,无论如何答案将会是一个整型数。
The basic idea in solving these equations and integrating is you find one answer, so then when you take enough derivatives, the function does what it's supposed to do.
解决这类方程以及积分的基本思想就是,你求出一个解,然后进行多次求导,求导的结果就满足条件
But in fact, it is not. And so, something I find myself repeating over and over again to myself, to my graduate students, is when you get an answer from the computer, always ask yourself, why do I believe it?
但是实际上,它并不是,因此,我一直一遍又一遍的重复的,给我自己和你们这些学生的就是,当计算机给出一个答案后,一定要问问自己为什么要相信这个答案?
It sounds like a hifalutin phrase you use when you're trying to persuade a VC to fund you. Right So to answer this, we really have to ask a different question, a related question; so, what's computation?
这听着很像当你试图,让VC语言帮你的时候说的大话,对,所以为了回答这个问题,我们需要提出一个难题,一个有关的问题;,因此,什么是计算相关呢??
应用推荐