And now Milton's in the position of asking, "What for? What's this all about? Look what happened to Edward King.

现在弥尔顿在问，“为了什么？，这都是为了什么？，看看爱德华·金。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

We can say that Iser's position is a reconstruction of what Gadamer has, essentially, to say about the merger of horizons.

我们可以说，伊瑟尔的观点,本质上是葛达玛观点的改写，比如说视域的融合。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

It's easy to know what nucleotide to put in each position as you're going along and polymerizing a new molecule.

这使得复制过程中决定下一个核苷酸位点,应该用哪一个核苷酸更为容易

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

But now that we're here,we're in a position perhaps to raise the question, should we be asking what it takes to survive?

现在我们必须想要提出的问题应该是，要怎样才能生存？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

The Second Brother, you'll remember, had taken what I take to be the perfectly reasonable position, the cautious position, that the Lady is in danger - that she's a sitting duck, in fact, out there in the dangerous forest.

戏中的弟弟，你们记得，采取了,我认为非常合理的立场，小心谨慎的立场，他认为那位少女处于危险的境地,-她只身于危险的丛林之中，极易受到伤害。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

So now what I want you to think of is that at every political position there are two voters, and hence two possible candidates.

现在我希望你们考虑的是,在每个政治位置上有两个选民,因此是两个可能的候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

But it's particularly true for what is otherwise a very senior position of the WHCF.

那对于办公室的,高级职位,更为如此。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

And when you come to read it, what you're putting yourself in my position, as it were, and you are partaking of precisely the same activity as I "the first writer-reader" was.

而当你阅读时，换句话说，当你代替了我的角色时，你的阅读活动其实和我这个,第一个作者与读者的活动相同。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

And since we are not expecting the mass of the particle to change, what we really are saying is the uncertainty in its velocity times the uncertainty in its position is greater than the ratio of the Planck constant divided by 2 pi.

因为我们不期望,粒子质量发生变化，我们说的是,它速度的不确定度,乘以它位置的不确定度,比普朗克常量,除以2除以圆周率要大。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

What do you call that position?

你怎么称呼那个状态

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

.. And I begin by remembering... this is the way I begin most of my economic thoughts ...a conversation I had with Milton Friedman And Milton started with the position, first of all, what he wanted to do was decrease government spending.

我记得。,我习惯这么思考经济问题了,我记得曾和米尔顿·弗里德曼谈过一次话,刚开始，米尔顿的立场是，有一点先说明，他其实是希望,政府削减财政支出的。

斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

When and why did some Israelites adopt a Yahweh-only position, and seek to differentiate what they would call a pure Yahwism from the cult of Baal, for example?

何时，为何以色列人采纳了耶和华，唯一的地位，并且试图与他们所说的纯耶和华崇拜区别,比如说，与Baal宗教？

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So, the question we are going to ask is the following, "If I tell you that a particle has a constant acceleration a, can you tell me what the position x is?"

接下来要问的问题就是,如果我说某质点加速度恒为a,你能告诉我它的位移x是多少吗

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

That's Gadamer's position, and it is the position of anyone who opposes that of Hirsch, although what he means by the distinction is clear enough.

那是葛达玛的观点，也是所有赫施反对者的观点，虽然他对区别的定义已经够明显了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Once we get clear about what the relevant metaphysical glue is, we'll be in a position to start asking: Could this happen or not?

一旦我们知道了,形而上粘质是什么，我们就会问：,这会发生吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Believe me, I'm in no position to say, but that's what I'm told.

记着,我没有资格说,我只不过听别人这么说

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We're just saying we want What we're saying is, we know that the candidates aren't going to position themselves at 1 and aren't going to position themselves at 10.

我们只是想,我们要说的是,我们知道候选人,不会选择立场1,同样也不会选择立场10

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

That is Hirsch's other key position, and we can understand it by saying something like this: the meaning of a text is what the author intended it to mean -that is to say, what we can establish with a reliable paraphrase.

这就是赫施的另一个重要观点，我们可以这样理解它：,文章的意思是作者想要表达的,即我们通过适当的释意能够想到的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

language, my language ] -what I say and what I think in language--speaks true.] That's the position taken up, not at all the same thing as saying what's out there doesn't exist -nothing to do with that.

那就是，语言，我的语言，说的是真话,这里的语言是指我所说的，以及我用语言所思考的],就是那个立场，与说那里什么东西不存在是完全不同的,与那个没有任何关系。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And when somebody else then attacks them, say, "Look, I think that what John was saying was a good point and here's how I think he should have defended his position," or what have you.

并且当其他人攻击他们时，你说听着我觉得约翰说的是个好点子,和这是我认为他应该怎样维护自己的立场“,或者你有什么。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Maybe there is a difference there, I don't have a good theory as to what the difference is, since I don't have a good theory to what the difference is, I'm not in a good position to decide whether a reassembled body would be ? the same body or different body?

也许这两个案例是有不同，我没有充分的理论来,解释这两者之间的不同,由于我无法解释两者的不同，我也就无法去下结论,究竟重组的肉体,是原来的肉体还是不一样的肉体？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选