-
But that is a terrible mistake because we should know that sculptresses are very rare; very few people have the job of a sculptress or sculptor, so it's a mistake.
但这是严重错误,我们都很清楚,雕刻家是很罕见的职业,只有很少人会是雕刻家,所以这是错的
-
and your hairstylist says, "Oh, I know exactly what to do. We should make your hair blonde."
你的发型师说，“哦，我知道该怎么做。我们要把你染成一头金发。”
-
Obviously we don't expect you to know exactly what the distances are, but you should be able to compare them relatively.
当然我们不要求你么,要能知道具体这些位置是多少，但你们要能够相对比较它们。
-
We know, from the very first lesson of the class last time, that no one should choose these strategies.
从上堂课中,我们学到了,不要采用这类策略
-
Classical, maybe a little more than that, but not all that many. Here's-- I don't know, we should do a survey sometime.
古典音乐,也许稍多一点,但没有多少,大概,我不清楚,也许应该找时间做个调查
-
You've got things like grains and fruits that we know people should be eating.
还有多吃谷物和水果,它们显然对人体很有利
-
It's a question rather of how we know the author to be there, firstly, and secondly, whether or not in attempting we should appeal to the authority of an author.
首先我们如何知道作者在那儿，其次，决定文本意义的时候,如果作者只是一种功能。
-
I remember one time I was talking to our CEO and he said, you know maybe we should pay at least one dividend because our employees are forgetting that they own these shares.
有一次我跟首席执行官谈起这事,他说,也许我们应该至少付一次股利,员工们都快忘了他们有股份这事儿了
-
If we all have a desire to know, ? doesn't this connote something universal, that all should be free, that all should participate in ruling and being ruled as citizens of a city?
如果我们都有求知欲，这不就意味着一种普遍性吗，即所有的人都应是自由人，所有的公民应参与城市中的统治,与被统治的活动？
-
And so this is not like a math problem set or a physics problem set. Or, like a high school physics lab, where we all know what the answer should be, and you could fake your lab results anyway.
或是物理问题集合,又或者是高中的物理实验室，我们对这些问题都有确切的答案，或者你可以把你的实验结果改成正确的，有些事情是不能明确界定的。
-
So it's very hard to know what moral should we draw.
所以很难知道该引出什么教训。
-
So, we know in this example the initial height should be 15 meters and the initial velocity should be 10, and for acceleration, I'm going to use -g and to keep life simple, I'm going to call it -10.
我们知道在这个例子中,初始高度为15米,初始速度为10,然后是加速度,我们用"-g"表示重力加速度,为了计算方便,加速度的值取为-10
-
And it should make sense where we got this from, because we know that the binding energy, if we're talking about a hydrogen atom, what is the binding energy equal to?
很容易理解，我们怎么得到这个的，因为我们知道，结合能，如果，对氢原子来说，结合能等于什么？
-
So this should immediately look like a problem because we know, in fact, that methane is tetravalent, and this is telling us it's only divalent.
显然这看起来是一个问题,因为我们知道实际上，甲烷是四价的，而这告诉我们它仅仅是二价的。
-
We know from last time that you should not choose a dominated strategy, and we also know we probably aren't going to choose a weakly dominated strategy, and we also know that you should put yourself in other people's shoes and figure out that they're not going to play strongly or strictly or weakly dominated strategies.
上节课我们学到了,不要采用劣势策略,然后今天我们学到了,我们有时可能不会选择弱劣势策略,我们还学会了站在别人立场上思考,然后推测出他们不会选择,严格劣势策略或弱劣势则略
-
I should say, to my knowledge, we know nothing more about Glaucon and Adeimantus from history, but Plato put them into his dialogue.
我必需说的是，就我所知Glaucon，和，Adeimantus，两人,仅是历史中的两个角色，但柏拉图将他们放入他的对话录。
-
So, you should know that there's four radial nodes, right, we have 5 minus 1 minus l -- is there a question?
你们要记住这里有四个节点，对吧，５减去１减去ｌ，有问题吗？
-
And what they could come up with, what they reasoned, is that there must be some intrinsic property within the electron, because we know that this describes the complete energy of the orbital should give us one single frequency.
他们想到着一定和，电子的本征性质有关，因为我们知道这个轨道的,完整描述会给出单一的频率。
-
And what we predict as an energy difference between two levels, we know should correspond to the energy of light that's either emitted, if we're giving off a photon, or that's absorbed if we're going to take on a photon and jump from a lower to a higher energy level.
我们预测，两个能级之间的能量差，我们知道，它要么和发出的光有关,如果它发出光子的话，要么它吸收光子,从低能级跃迁到，更高能级上去。
-
This should make a lot of sense, because we know that a hydrogen has 1 s as it's outer-most or valence orbital, so it can be filled up just with two 1 s electrons.
这也是很合理的，因为我们,知道氢只有，1，s，轨道,这就是它最外层的轨道或者说价轨道，因此只要两个，1，s，电子就可以将它填满。
-
If you've read through that material and you should have read through it by now you know that we have a value in music.
如果你通读这个材料,现在你应该也已经通读过了这一部分,你应该知道我们的音乐中有一种音符值
-
This intuitively should make a lot of sense, because we know we're trying to minimize electron repulsions to keep things in as low an energy state as possible, so it makes sense that we would put one electron in each orbital first before we double up in any orbital.
这个直观上讲得通，因为我们知道尝试去最小化电子排斥力,从而尽可能的保持处于一个较低的能态,所以它讲得通,在我们在同一个轨道放入两个电子之前,我们首先把电子放入每一个轨道。
-
So what we know here, we know that Player II should not choose right.
从中我们得出参与者II不应该选右
应用推荐