We accept it and we create games around it.
我们接受它,并利用它发明游戏。
OK, so far though, I've just shown you what happens inside a peace a code. It raises an exception. It goes to that accept clause. We don't have to use it just inside of one place.
好了,我已经给你们看了,代码内部发生了什么,它报了一个异常,然后就到了处理的片段,我们不该就在一个地方用它。
It's a tricky way how do you impose your ideas and how do we accept other ideas. -Absolutely.
这挺奇妙的,怎样向别人推销自己的观点,而我们本身又是如何接受别的观点的,-的确如此。
We have to understand the way in which it's something that, if we're going to accept this point of view, we need to live with.
我们需要理解的是,如果我们接受某一观点,它就会如影随形地跟着我们。
And if we are not willing to accept that implication, it seems as though we need to reject the soul theory of personal identity.
如果我们不愿,接受这种结论,似乎,我们就需要拒绝承认,人格同一性的灵魂论。
So I don't necessarily accept all my irrational thoughts and again, we'll talk about it much more next week of how we can cognitively reframe what we were thinking.
我没有必要接受,所有不理智的想法,下周我们会更深入地探讨,如何认知性地重塑自己的想法。
It's one that we'll take up in greater detail, though, when we get to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is stressed to a greater degree than it is in Exodus, but for now, we can accept Levenson's claim that Sinai represents an intersection of law and love, because of the use of the suzerainty model.
这点占据了很细节的描述,当我们读到《申命记》,其中强调的程度比《出埃及记》要多得多,但是现在,我们只能接受Levenson的主张,那就是,西奈代表了律法与热爱的交叉点,因为用到了领主模式。
But in the meantime it's probably on this occasion, once we accept them both as having come under the influence of the same form of linguistic thinking, to say a little bit about the similarities and differences that exist between Derrida and de Man.
但同时在这种场合下可能,一旦我们接受这俩概念,在受到同样的语言学思想的影响后,我们就能看到一些,德里达和德曼之间存在的相同点和不同点。
Now the question is "how does it expand" and "why is it so difficult for us to understand, accept, assimilate and live according to the fact that we can make a difference, if we understand that what we need to understand is how change happens.
问题是“它如何扩大“,以及为什么我们难以理解,我们能够做出改变这个事实,并接受,被同化以及据此生活,如果我们能了解我们需要理解的,是改变如何发生。
应用推荐