I guess they're elected officials and their voters are not finance theorists and don't think of this in these terms.

我想这是因为他们是当选的官员,而投票的不是金融学家,也就不会用金融术语思考和表达。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Sure, voter turnout has been dropping, and it might appear that voters are apathetic about the political system.

是啊，现在参与投票的人越来越少，看起来投票人对政治体系相当冷漠。

对于义务投票制 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So it turns out that the very first one, voters are not evenly distributed is certainly true, it's undoubtedly true.

首相想到的就是,现实中选民是不均匀分布的,这的确是毋庸置疑的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

He was trying to make the conservative free market position more palatable for voters as a whole, and this is the one thing which he did so.

他试图,让共和党的自由市场理念,更加容易被选民们接受，让民众买得起房就是他的做法之一。

斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

I get all the voters right on top of me at position 1 and she gets everyone else, is that right?

我得到选择立场1的10%选票,对手得到剩余90%的选票,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

He took the Democratic Party to the right, i.e., towards the center in order to pick up those central voters and win.

他将民主党向右翼靠拢,也就是说变得中立,以此来拉拢中间选民并获胜

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So one thing that seems odd about the way we set up this model is that the voters are not evenly distributed.

有一点使我们建立此模型的假设很牵强,即是选民们不是均匀分布的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So now what I want you to think of is that at every political position there are two voters, and hence two possible candidates.

现在我希望你们考虑的是,在每个政治位置上有两个选民,因此是两个可能的候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If there's a tie, half the voters at that position go for one of the candidates and half of them go for the other.

如果是平均,一半的选票划给其中一个候选人,另一半给另一个候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So in politics, this is about candidates crowding close together towards the center, to try and get as many voters who are close to them.

在政治学中,这是关于候选人集中趋向中间立场,从而拉拢更多立场相近的选民的理论

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So one thing that's missing, or wrong if you like, but the one thing is the voters are not evenly distributed in the real world.

被忽视的因素,或者说错误在于,在现实生活中,每个立场的选民数并非是均分的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So just to make that clear, voters vote for the closest running candidate first.

再说清楚一点,首先,选民投票给最近的候选者

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We're going to assume that voters will eventually vote for the closest candidate.

我们假设,选民会投票给离他们最近的候选人

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

As before, as in the Downs or Hoteling model, we discussed already a few weeks ago, we're going to assume that voters are evenly spread along the line.

像之前一样,就像当斯或霍特林模型,我们几周前讨论的,我们将假设选民,平均分布在这条线上

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So let's be careful here, we're not saying that we're going to delete the voters at 1, or delete the voters at 10, though we might wish to.

我们需要注意的是,我们并没有说要剔除立场1,或者立场10的选票,虽然我们希望能这样

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we're going to assume even distribution of voters on the line.

我们假设选民在线上平均分布

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选