This is not an x versus time plot or y versus time.

这不是 x 坐标关于时间的图像,或 y 坐标关于时间图像

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

Last time, we argued about the case of Queen versus Dudley and Stevens, the lifeboat case, the case of cannibalism at sea.

上节课，我们讨论了,女王诉达德利和斯蒂芬斯案，即救生艇的案例，海上食人惨案。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

And fixed versus variable speaks to whether you give a reward on a fixed schedule, every fifth time, or variable, sometimes on the third time, sometimes on the seventh time, and so on.

固定与变化则是相对于,你是否根据固定时程给予奖励而言的，每五次就给予奖励，或者是变化的，有时候在第三次上给予奖励，有时候则在第七次上给予奖励。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So what I've said so far is, a particle moving in time from point to point can be represented by a graph, x versus t.

到目前为止,我说过,一个质点随时间的连续运动,可以用一幅x-t图来表示

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

With this basic principle of utility on hand, let's begin to test it and to examine it by turning to another case, another story, but this time, not a hypothetical story, a real life story, the case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stevens.

有了这条最基本的功利原则，让我们检验一下这条原则,是否适用于另一案例，而这一次，就不再是假定的事件了，是个真实的故事，女王诉达德利和斯蒂芬斯案。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So what we would like to do is to describe what the object does by drawing a graph of time versus space and the graph would be something like this.

然后我们要做的就是描述这个物体的运动,通过画一个"x-t"图,画出来的图就像这样

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选