And so, even by units analysis, if the units come out right, you've got a good shot that unless you've really, really messed up, that the answer is going to be right.

甚至在单位分析中，如果你的单位正确，你就能做的很有条理否则会一团糟，而注意了单位你的答案才有可能正确。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

What really matters about a leader is their committment to getting to the right answer and to doing it in the right way.

对于好的领导者而言,重要的是致力于,得到正确答案,以及如何用正确的方式来实现它。

普林斯顿公开课 - 领导能力简介课程节选

So the book is really an effort to answer what role America should play in the world.

这本书事实上是在试图,回答美国在世界这个大环境中应该扮演怎样的角色。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

To answer this question you just really want to think about what does electron affinity means.

要想答对这个问题,你只需要好好想一想,电子亲和能的真正意义。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I really didn't know and I needed to have an answer to this question. So I created Star Festival with this team from MIT in order to try to answer this question.

我不知道，我需要一个答案,所以我和我来自麻省的团队,创造了，“七夕“项目,以回答这个问题。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

So, cognitive dissonance motivates me to create an answer that's more comfortable for me, "This must be a really wonderful group with a wonderful bunch of people."

所以认知失调促使我想出另一个答案,让我可以接受的答案，“这一定是一个很棒的兄弟会，里面的人都很棒”

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

She doesn't really want to answer that question.

所以不想回答。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

So that's really - these are really difficult questions to answer.

所以这些问题,这些问题都是极难处理的

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

And it may be that what we should conclude is, whatever the best answer to that question is, it's not the question we should really have been thinking about.

也许我们能得出的结论是，无论这问题最佳的答案是什么，这都不是我们最该考虑的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It sounds like a hifalutin phrase you use when you're trying to persuade a VC to fund you. Right So to answer this, we really have to ask a different question, a related question; so, what's computation?

这听着很像当你试图,让VC语言帮你的时候说的大话,对，所以为了回答这个问题，我们需要提出一个难题，一个有关的问题；,因此，什么是计算相关呢？？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.

所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And it turns out that the answer to can we have this physical interpretation of thinking about what psi means, the answer is really no, that we can't.

我们能否,对psi，有个,物理解释呢？,答案是不能。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

And I've got to worry about, is somebody else using ANS, answer, as a variable, in which case I've got to be really careful. Is somebody else using x as a variable? I've got to deal with a lot of those details.

而且我还要担心有没有别人,使用了ANS，answer作为变量,这样我就必须要非常小心,有没有别人用x当做变量呢？,我需要处理很多类似的细节。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选