So says to this person, "Isn't it strange you have this dead-end job when you're twice as smart as your boss?
狗跟这个人说,”你不觉得很奇怪吗,你做这份没出头之日的工作,你的才智比你上司高一倍?
You are very smart and very talented on this subject.
在这种事上你真是既聪明又有才。
You were smart and adorable and all this time I assumed you were dumb and adorable.
你很聪明,而且很可爱,这么久了我竟然一直以为你可爱但只是不会说话呢“
But it's amazing, that every year you find somebody coming up with a way of going around the second law and somehow convincing people who are very smart that this will work.
但是很令人惊奇,每年你都能发现,有人宣称找到了,绕过第二定律的方法,还不知怎么地就说服了,一些非常聪明的人,让他们以为这个真的管用。
This was actually a really smart guy because he was selfless and could objectively assess what he was really capable of doing at that moment in time.
他真得很聪明,因为,他很无私,并且能够客观地评价自己的能力,自己在那个时候能做什么。
And people who study this often claim to be studying neural network modeling to try to build smart machines by modeling them after brains.
神经网络的研究者们,通常会说他们是在研究神经网络模型,试图通过模仿大脑反应,而制造出智能机器
That gets us to the smart thief. Why is this thief smart? Because she took 600. And she learned 600 that in fact there is a good way to solve this problem. And that's what we're going to talk about next. And that's something called dynamic programming.
现在我们要当聪明的贼,这个贼为什么聪明呢?,因为它选择了,它知道这事实上是解决这个问题的好方法,这就是我们接下来要讲的,也就是动态编程。
So, you may or may not know this about your TAs, but this is a pretty competitive group of TAs we have this year, and they like to brag about how smart their recitation is, how good questions they're getting in the recitation section.
不知道你们是否知道这与你们的助教有关,但是今年我们的助教们,都非常有才,而且他们都想向别人炫耀一下,自己的讨论课做得有多漂亮,回答的问题有多好。
Now, all of this would be fine if your unconscious was a reasonable, rational computer, if your unconscious was really smart and looking out for your best interest.
如果无意识是台理智的计算机,它非常聪明,总在为你寻求最佳利益,那其实也倒没什么。
You can take a problem that might be relatively intuitive to solve but when you scale this thing up as is increasingly the case in the web, in large data systems, and so forth, you actually have to now think smart, you actually have to think efficiently and you have to solve this problem effectively.
你可以把一个问题用比较直观的方法解决,但如果你把此类问题的数量增大,正如越来越多的互联网,和大规模数据系统中出现的问题等等,你应该考虑怎样才能更简便,怎样才能更高效,你应该用行之有效的方法处理问题。
But the cases of specific language impairments suggest that all of that is wrong, because there are children in this world right now who are plenty smart, who really want to communicate, and who are entirely social creatures but they can't learn language.
但是特殊言语损伤的案例表明,以上的所有都是错的,因为现在在世界上,会有些足够聪明,想要交流,完全社会生物的儿童,他们无法学习语言
So, suppose you fall in love with somebody and you decide you want to marry them and then somebody was asked to ask you why and you'd say something like, " "Well, I'm ready to get married this stage of my life; " I really love the person; " the person is smart and attractive; I want to have kids" whatever.
假设你爱上了某人,想要与对方一同步入婚姻的殿堂,要是有人问你为什么想要与对方共度余生,你大概会说,“现在我已准备好要开始婚姻生活了;,或“我真心的爱着他;,或“他聪明有魅力;,“我想要小孩了“,等等。
So, it seemed like a good start for me, pre-med/bio, and I signed up for my bio class -- I found out, as Professor Drennen did, that I had to take chemistry as well. I wasn't as upset, I was sort of a neutral chemistry person at this point, but I thought it was pretty smart to get it over with on the first semester, so that's what I did.
一个既在科学上有挑战又能帮助他人的职业,从医学预科或者生物起家-,我参加了生物课,我和Drennen教授一样,我也必须要上化学课,我并没有很不爽,我当时对化学的态度很中立。
应用推荐