That's a little bit like the case we worried about when we started thinking about the soul view,right?

这就有点像我们刚开始研究灵魂观点时,担心的问题了，对吧？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Please don't go away thinking that what I just said is, here's a new argument for the soul.

请别就理所当然地想着我刚才说的，觉得灵魂的存在又有了新的论据。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

One way of thinking about the metaphor of city and soul together is to think of it as a particular kind of causal hypothesis, about the formation of both individual character and political institutions.

思考城市与灵魂结合的方法,是将其想象成,是一种特别类型的,因果假说，关于形塑,个人性格与政治制度。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

To see this,suppose we start by thinking again about the soul view.

为了明白这个，让我们先从灵魂观点开始。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If harmony really is invisible, and harmony really can be destroyed, that invisible things can be destroyed, even the soul is nothing like you know, that's not a good analogy for thinking of the physicalist position, have you? So what?

如果和声真的无形，而和声真的可以毁灭，那么无形的东西可以毁灭，即使灵魂不同于和声,如果从物理学家的观点来看,这不是个好的类比，那又如何？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选