So what should I do? Actually I lied, by the way, when I said the answer was over there.
我应该怎么做呢,实际上当我说答案,在那儿的时候我撒谎了。
What is this orbital? Yup. And there's only 2pz one correct answer here, which is to 2 p z.
它的轨道是什么?,嗯,这里,只有一个答案,那就是。
I think the answer may involve the possibility that at the beginning of the poem, there simply wasn't a clear distinction between the poet and the speaker.
答案可能包括了,在诗歌的开头,根本就没有一个清晰的区分的可能性。
There's a Midterm. That will be a short answer test that's intended to give you a chance to show how diligently you've been reading and coming to class.
我们会有一个期中考,会有一张简答问卷,目的是能够让你们表现出,你们的勤劳,用功阅读和按时上课。
Nobody knows, but there's a theory which won't answer your question but will put it into a broader context.
没有人知道答案,但有这么个理论,它无法回答你的问题,但却能让你从更宽广的视角来看这个问题
To which there could many answers at the Battle of Mantinea, but it seems there's a much easier answer.
曼提尼亚战役可能会给我们很多答案,但以下的回答可能是最直接的
There are two possibilities. If the answer is yes, then I'm still looking for the answer, what do I want to do? Well, I don't have to do anything other than change the counter.
这就是一个测试,有两种可能的结果,如果结果为是的话,然后我就要继续找寻目标数,我该怎么做呢?好。
There is obviously no magic solution to this question but the best answer I know of is Socrates.
这个问题,没有神奇的解答,但我认为最佳的答案是苏格拉底。
You have to accept the answer, but there are new answers besides the one you were looking for.
只有接受答案,但是除了你要的答案,还会有新的发现
Is there any experimental evidence that can put this to the test? And the answer is yes.
还有什么其他的实验证据能检测这个吗,当然有。
Then, there's a lot of computation going on to figure out what's the right answer.
将进行大量计算,以找到正确答案。
Even though Socrates doesn't respond to that objection, we need to ask on Socrates' behalf, is there a possible answer to this objection?
即使苏格拉底没有回应它,我们要代表苏格拉底发问,这个观点有没有可能的答案?
However they get there, if they get to the right answer, people respect them.
无论中间的过程如何,只要他们能够得到正确答案,就能赢得人们的尊敬。
And there is a lot of research to answer this question.
大量研究都尝试回答这个问题。
We'll try to raise them with all the technologies, we won't try to answer them, there are probably better people at Yale to answer those kinds of questions than I am.
我们会将其与有关技术共同提出,但是这里我不会给出解决方法,或许在耶鲁大学有其他专家,更擅长这些问题
So you know from algebra I can't actually solve this. There may be multiple solutions to this. What would I have to do to change my code? And the answer is fortunately not a lot.
我解不出来方程,可能会有多组答案,我需要怎样修改我的代码呢?,很幸运的,答案是不用修改很多。
So, let's see what the correct answer is, Wakefield and it is, in fact, Wakefield, right, because there's an inverse relationship between how fast a particle is going and what its wavelength is.
所以,让我们来看看,正确的答案是什么,事实上,答案是,因为粒子运动的快慢,与它的波长之间是一个反比例关系。
But there is one thing, Descartes concluded, that he cannot doubt, and the answer is he cannot doubt that he is himself thinking.
但笛卡尔认为,有一点是他无法置疑的,那就是,他无法怀疑自我思考的存在
The answer is, in fact, there is zero, absolutely zero probability of finding a electron here.
实际上它在这里是为零的,在这里找到电子的概率严格等于零。
It might turn out if I had X-ray vision that what I see is this... Then the answer'd be there's not one train here.
有可能是,我看到的是这样。,答案就不是同一辆火车。
And it's just gathering together the multiplications while counting down the exponent. And you can see it when we get down to the end test here, we're going to pop out of there and we're going to return the answer.
这个方法就是通过乘法,来一个一个的减小指数,可以看到,最后面的结果测试,我们会在这里退出,然后返回答案。
应用推荐