Now Brooks then uses these terms in ways that should be familiar to us, as I say. We have now been amply exposed to them in reading Jakobson and de Man.
而就想我之前说过的那样,布鲁克斯,用一种我们熟悉的方式运用这两个词,我们在读雅各布森和德曼的著作时已经充分见识过了。
that every company that uses advertising needs to then bake into the cost of the product.
所有打广告的公司都要把广告成本加入产品成本里。
It could be the pair of none, none, it could be the pair of, you know, whatever the answer was that we put up there. That value comes back out and is now available inside the scope of Barnyard. OK. And Barnyard then uses that. Question?
也可以是,你知道,任何我们在这里得到的答案,这个返回的值在Barnyard范围内,就可以使用了,然后Barnyard就使用了这个值,有什么问题吗?
And he uses those as discussion materials and Then he's carefully indexed those against things Like the Oxford English edition.
他用这些材料作为讨论材料,然后他仔细把这些材料,像牛津英语词典这样整理起来。
And if we're stuck with it,then of course it's not an objection against any one of the theories that uses it.
而且如果我们卡在了这里,任何一个理论适用这规则都无妨。
Indeed, swap in your printout there is just defined as now taking *a and *b and then it also uses the * later, but we'll come back to what the different uses of the * means, but for now I claim conceptually it just means swap has access to the locations of its parameters.
的确,在打印资料中的swap被定义为,携带*a和*b,之后它也是带*号的,但是我们将说明*的不同用法,现在,我断言swap可以,使用参数的地址。
If I decide there's a better way to get input, and there is, then I can make it to change what I don't have to change the code that uses the input.
如果我觉得有更好的获取输入的方法,我可以直接改去用这种方式,而不用更改使用了,输入处的代码。
应用推荐