And so let's take a look at what that does in terms of graphical representation.

所以让我们看看它们在图示中,是什么情况吧。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

So, that's probability density, but in terms of thinking about it in terms of actual solutions to the wave function, let's take a little bit of a step back here.

这就是概率密度，但作为,把它当成是，波函数的解，让我们先倒回来一点。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

It is a declaration of absolute interdependency among the things that we understand in binary terms but that we take somehow one to be causative of the other when we think about them.

这是在宣布事物之间的绝对的相互性,我们能在二元关系上理解这些事,但是我们惯常于把一个是当成另一个的原因。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Everyone at MIT has to take two terms of physics, mechanics and electromagnetism.

这里的所有学生都需要修两学期的,物理，力学，和电磁学。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

I need a contract that says, here's what I want in terms of things that you're going to take as input, to begin your part of the drama, here's what you're going to produce at the output, and the details of what they do inside are up to them.

这些作家相互沟通进行工作呢？,我需要一封规格说明书,我需要一份合约，上面列出了我想要你做的事，这些是你要再开始时做的输入,这些是你要的输出,细节工作就取决于它们了。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

They'll have something going and then almost unbeknownst to you they will take that and lift it up in terms of the pitch content.

他们会让音乐继续,然后出其不意,通过音高大小,来升华它

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

Now,I want to take just a couple of minutes and mention some other puzzles, or at least questions,worth thinking about in terms of the physicalist picture.

现在我想要用一点时间，提一下其他的谜团，或是说从物理主义者角度值得思考的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

again carefully because I'm free to take anything from Key Terms and Key Concepts from the chapters that were assigned for this part of the course.

法博齐等人的作品，因为我将会从,本门课指定的章节中自由地引用,重要的术语和概念。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Is it true that nobody can take my part in terms of my death?

然而死亡就无法替代吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So let's just think exactly what this means, and that means that if we take away function and we define it in terms of n, l and m sub l, what we're defining here is the complete description of an orbital.

让我们来考虑一下这是什么意思，这是说如果我们不考虑波函数,而是用ｎ，ｌ，ｍ下标ｌ来定义它，我们定义的,是一个轨道的完整描述。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So, I will point out, in terms of MO theory, because it rigorously does take into account quantum mechanics, it starts to become complicated once we go beyond diatomic molecules.

我要指出的是，对于MO理论，以为它严格的遵守量子力学，所以一旦超过双原子分子,就变得十分复杂了。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I take it that we all agree that when we attempt to run the Cartesian argument in terms of the Morning Star and the Evening Star, it fails. But it's harder to say what went wrong?

我想大家都同意,当我们试图把卡氏论证,用到晨星和昏星的例子上来时,它行不通了,但是很难说我们哪里错了

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选