So really, the rule of thumb if you think back to Scratch is -- that any time you write a statement -- -- something that does something in one line of code -- you generally need the semicolon there.
实际上,根据经验,你们回忆一下在Scratch中,任何时候你们写一条语句-,处理一些操作的一行代码-,你们通常需要在那里加个分号。
Even more dangerously, from the standpoint of anybody who likes poetry, he talks instead of "statement," meaning science, and "pseudo-statement," meaning poetry.
更危险的是,在任何一个热爱诗歌的人看来,他转用“陈述“指代科学,用“伪陈述“指代诗歌。
It's perfectly impossible, I think, to imagine a stronger statement than this of the authority that Milton gives, the intellectual self-possession that he ascribes, to the individual.
我认为这完全是有可能的,去想一个比弥尔顿,这个理论更有力的论述,他认为每个个人拥有的沉着冷静和泰然自若。
Al-Qaeda makes the statement: how can my identity dominate and destroy your identity?
基地组织声称:,如何能使我的身份支配并摧毁你的身份?
I think that may be the first-known statement of the binomial distribution.
我认为这就是最早的,关于二项分布的阐述
In one of Plato's lesser known dialogues he makes a statement--the following statement, which I think shows both the typical arrogance of the Greeks and also says something true.
在柏拉图的一个不怎么出名的对话录中,他作了一个声明,以下是这些声明,我认为它们既是希腊人典型的傲慢的体现,又说到了一些事实
First statement by Newton-- I don't feel like writing it down.
牛顿第一定律,我不想写出来
Now the other point here is that "the definition" of recession seems to be evolving... What you gave... -Didn't I give the statement that ? you gave this to your students what I just gave, right?
关键还在于,对于经济衰退的定义尚无定论。,你刚才给的版本。。。,-难道我的陈述,你教给学生的也是这个版本吧?
You can go buy a score of the Beatles, for example--although they didn't design this initially with music, but after the fact,people sort of listen to it and make written-- put in written form what had originally been just an aurally conceived artistic statement.
你完全可以去,比如说买一些披头士的乐谱,但是他们当初写歌的时候并没有想用乐谱的形式传播,事实是人们听了他们的歌,再把它们写下来-,人们只是把一项为听觉设计的艺术品用笔记录下来。
Here, print F, recalls a statement and just like in scratch, statements were these one-liners.
这里,printf,召回了一个语句,像在scratch中,语句是这些单行方式的。
This is in 2005-- Lykken: "I made a dumb statement.
005年,Lykken说:,“我作了一个愚蠢的声明。
But Larry Paige at Google can call up a broker-- he better get the board's permission-- somebody at Google can call up a broker and make the same statement: we want to buy Google shares.
但是谷歌的拉里·佩奇也给经纪人打电话,当然要经过董事会允许,谷歌的某个雇员可以给经纪人打电话,然后做出同样的买入要求,我们想买进谷歌的股份
Once we sort of settle into this vocabulary, and once we get used to this clearly unquestioningly scientific perspective, why on earth do we need pseudo-statement or fiction at all?
一旦我们习惯了这种用语,一旦我们习惯了,这种科学视角,我们为什么还需要伪陈述和虚构呢?
Now, people--some people make an enormous jump from that and wrongly suggest that what the Greeks basically did was-- well, if you want to take the most extreme statement of it, stole their civilization from the other folks.
现在有些人,跳脱了这个定义,错误地认为,希腊人仅仅是,如果选取其中最极端的陈述,从他人那里窃取了文明
You are really out on a limb - if you're going to defend poetry--as Richards kept doing-- as "pseudo-statement," but of course pseudo-statement" is just another expression for what he calls here "fiction."
你会陷入孤立无援的境地,如果你像,Richards一样-,说诗歌是“伪陈述“,当然,这里“伪陈述“只是,“虚构“的另一种说法“
应用推荐