So right now,let's imagine two people with Napoleon's personalities, complete personalities,one of them in Michigan,one of them in New York.
那么现在试想一下,有两个人拥有拿破仑的人格,完整的人格,一个在密西根,一个在纽约。
So right now I'm, we're just, uh, sort of learning the basics of the language.
所以现在我们正在学习日语的基础课程。
So right footed players find it easier to shoot to the left as facing, to shoot across the goal.
习惯用右脚射门的球员从左路进攻,会更容易把球射入球门
So right in the packaging of this novel that we have today this cover has changed over time nevertheless, even today, that very Catholic iconography is right on the front of the cover.
所以对于我们的这本书,虽然封面随着时间一直在改变,但是即使是今天,天主教的肖像画依然,出现在了封面的中央。
So right now, the real estate sector is like extremely dominant.
所以现在,房地产行业支配着经济发展。
So right now, it's something like 2% or it's a little bit higher last year, but maybe it'll be 2% going forward.
希勒有可能记错了08年2月份的美国通胀率为4%,略高于去年的水平,但未来应该会维持在2%左右
so right now, it's very tough.
所以就目前来看,这是很艰难的。
So right now I'm looking at the chairs in the auditorium.
比如说,我现在正盯着观众席上的椅子
All right. So much for the introductory lectures which touch on aspects of the materials that we'll keep returning to.
好了,这就是导读课程了,我们讲到了我们接下来要讲的材料的内容。
But this is a compound, right, it has some non-zero heat of formation from the elements. So is water, right?
但这是种化合物,对吧?,它具有非零的生成热,水也是一样,对吧?
CO Right, so you take the co here, and we take the valence here, and out of that comes covalent.
好了,然后我们看到,我们可以看到他的化合价,他们成共价键。
So you can see right away the students knew that they will be selected as a very honor to the pool.
所以,学生们很快,就会知道他们将成为,该组织的荣耀。
Hence the title of this slide all right so 2, we've got you two paired off?
这个幻灯片的标题没说错吧,2个人吗,我们已经为你们两两配对了?
All right, so that's what we're going to cover in terms of the energy portion of the Schrodinger equation.
好,这就是我们要讲的,关于薛定谔方程能量的部分。
So, for example, when you have the issue like Hebron Right? So there is a lot of religious tension there. Because ... it's an ancient side, or Jerusalem.
比如说,当你有希伯伦这个问题,就会有很多宗教的紧张局面,因为。,这和历史有关,或是关乎耶路撒冷。
So, all right. Good. Are there any other defenders who say it's just categorically wrong, with or without consent?
很好,有没其他人要辩护的,谁认为就是绝对错的,不管有没征得同意?
应用推荐