People tend to think, because the computer says it's so, it must be so. That the computer is- speaks for God. And therefore it's infallible.

那么一定就是这么回事了,他们认为计算机代表着神一样的存在-,因此是不可能犯错的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So, on 169, he says to Franny as she's sniveling on the couch: "God almighty, Franny," he said.

在169页，当弗兰尼躺在沙发上时，他说：,全能的上帝，弗兰尼。

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

So he asks who God is, God says, "I am who am I am" or "I will cause to be what I will cause to be."

他问上帝到底是谁，上帝回答“我是自有永有的“,或者“我将会是我本该是的模样“

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

He's spoken of anthropomorphically, so that we can capture his interaction with human beings. This is the only way, Kaufman says, you can write in any meaningful sense about the interaction between God and humanity. So he has to be anthropomorphized.

上帝像人一样说话，这样我们就能和他交流,这是唯一和上帝对话的方式，你可以从各个方面写下上帝与人类的相互作用,因此上帝必须富有人性。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So, there's a wonderful thirteenth-century commentator that says that God needed creatures who could choose to obey him, And therefore it was important for Adam and Eve to do what they did And to learn that they had the choice not to obey God so that their choice for God would become endowed with meaning.

十三世纪有一位著名的评论家说,上帝需要有能力选择遵从他的生物，因此，夏娃亚当做他们所做的事情很重要,并发现他们可以选择不遵从上帝,那么他们对上帝的遵从便有了意义。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选