He has two electrons here with the same set of quantum numbers. B but these are two separate hydrogen atoms.
因为我写了两个量子数,一样的电子,但这是在两个不同原子中啊。
I'm thinking about a problem, I'm going to show you an example in a second, first thing I'm going to do is say, what is the thing that's going to change every time I run through the same set of code?
我要解决一个问题,我马上会让大家看一个例子,第一件我要做的事情就是,弄明白每次运行同样的指令集时,每次都会改变的东西是什么?
I don't want to go to the common room and watch the same set with everyone else.
我不想挤在公共休息室里,和别人一起看一样的节目。
After all,I've got the very same set of memories, beliefs,desires that he has.
我拥有和他一样的记忆,信仰还有欲望。
You know, if you want to measure the potential energy of something in a gravitational field, you have to define the zero somewhere, right, because it's arbitrary. You can set it anywhere you want. It's the same with enthalpy.
你知道,如果你想测量重力场,中某种东西的势能,你需要,在某处定义一个零点,对吧?,因为势能的值是任意的,你可以把它设定在。
So here's a program set up in the same way, main looks the same.
这里有个同样的习题,大体看起来是一样的。
You don't need to say anything more about the phosphate because they all have the phosphate and every set of these is hooked together in the same way.
不需要再进一步说明磷酸基,因为两种核酸都含有磷酸基,并且以同样的方式相互连接
For example, one of the experiments we do is measure the magnetic field of current coil, and after we do the experiment, we all have a passive visualization that shows the same experimental set-up, except we add to that.
比如,我们做的一个实验就是,测量电线圈的磁场,在我们做完实验之后,我们都感受到了一个直观化的过程,它展现了同样的实验过程,只是那是我们加的。
But focusing on things that are sustainable and scalable so that when we launch more schools or go into the next market or whatever we do, we're going to set ourselves up to have the same success that we've had without hurting our self in the current position.
还要关注可持续发展的事物,以及规模容易扩大的事物,当我们向新的学校扩展时,或是进军新市场时,目标就是获得,跟以前一样的成功,并且不破坏现有的水平。
And I want to remind you, that block of code is a set of instructions, the same set of instructions that are going to be done each time through the loop.
我想提醒大家,这块代码是一个指令集,一个每次循环都会被执行的相同指令集,会变化的仅仅是变量的值。
Some people like to use shallow and deep, object and value, but they're talking about the same thing, which is it the same object or is it the same, in this case, set of values, depending on what you want to define as you use it.
有些人喜欢用对象相等值相等,但是它们是同一件东西,也就是是不是同一个对象,或者是不是同样的,在这个例子中,是同样的值集合,这取决于当你使用它的时候,想要怎么来定义它。
And I want you to get used to this, that colon is important, it identifies the start, and then the set of indented things identify all the things at the same level, and when we reset back to the previous level, that's when we go back to where we were.
我希望大家熟悉这个结构,冒号很重要,它定义了开始的地方,然后缩进号代表着,同样一层的对象,当我们到了,不缩进的地方的时候,也就到了以前的状态。
If you set up the atoms exactly the same way, they've always got to break down."
如果你精确地把原子以,同种方式设置,它们肯定会分裂
To be Napoleon,you've got to have the very same overall personality, which is a very big,complicated set of beliefs and desires and ambitions and memories.
要成为拿破仑,你必须拥有完全一样的整体人格,那是一整套庞大复杂的信念,欲望,抱负和记忆组合。
A broader set of primitives, but nonetheless the same fundamental thing holds.
一些广阔的基本类型,但还是同样的基本东西。
And when I do this test, what I want to do, is say I'm going to pick the middle spot, and depending on the test, if I know it's in the upper half, I'm going to set my start at the mid point and the end stays the same, if it's in the front half I'm going to keep the front the same and I'm going to change the endpoint.
如果我知道目标数可能,再比中值点大的区间里,我可能就会把开始点设为中值点,而尾点不变,如果在小的那个区间里,就保持开始点不变而把尾点设为中值点,你们可以看到这儿的代码,就是这么做的,对不对?它是怎么做的?
And so when the personality theorist says the key to personal identity is the same personality. They don't mean literally the very same set of believes and desires.
所以当人格论专家说道,人格同一性的关键在于,同样的人格时,他们指的不是,一成不变的一系列信仰和渴望。
That it seemed as though we could have more than one-- call it an individual--more than one body, that had the very same set of memories,beliefs and so forth.
就是说,有可能我们会拥有-,不止一个肉体,而这些肉体拥有相同的记忆及信仰等。
Diversification and pooling are really the same thing but we had a separate set of institutions.
分摊和汇聚实质上是一回事,只是我们有不同的机构
And so, if you rewind the tape and play it again over and over and over again, each time you set things up the very same way they must move or transform or change or end up in the very same state.
所以,如果你将一盘磁带,反反复复地播放,每次你播放的内容,从头到尾的起承转合一定是,绝对一致的
Maybe you don't control thermostats in your dorm room, some of you do and some of you don't probably, and maybe it doesn't work very well so it might not be a good example, but imagine a perfect thermostat that you set for a temperature and then the temperature stays the same inside the room no matter what the temperature is outside.
可能你根本就不理卧室里的恒温器,有些人去调它,有些人就置之不理,可能它压根就是坏的,所以这个例子也许并不恰当,但你还是想象一个完美运行的恒温器,你设定温度后房间里的温度就保持不变,不管外面温度是多少
I think one of the classic ones for strings is called the Rabin-Karp algorithm. And it's simply the same idea that you have a mapping from your import into a set of integers.
我认为字符串哈希,最经典的是Rabin-Karp算法,它只是简单的相同概念,你有一个映射关系将你的输入映射成一组数字。
Typing the same commands again and again and again make can be configured, as you'll soon see in problem set 2 or 3 to do all these for you.
一遍又一遍地输入同样的命令,但是make却是可以配置的,你们很快就会看到,在习题集2,3中,我会演示给你们看。
I'm going to give a name to that. And what you see there is I'm going to call divisors initially an empty tuple, something has nothing in it. Right here. And then I'm going to run through the same loop as before, going through this set of things, doing the check.
你们可以看到这里,我初始化一个空的元组,名为divisiors,这里,然后我会去运行,跟以前一样的循环,遍历这个集合内的东西,然后做检查,现在我要做的是,每次我找到了一个除数我要把它收集起来。
And odds are if a week hence, two weeks hence just for fun you decide to reimplement your Scratch project -- or some tiny piece of it, it wouldn't be surprising -- or shouldn't be -- if you end of implementing the same game or animation or whatever using a completely different set of puzzle pieces Same deal we'd see here.
可能一周之后,两周之后,为了好玩,你决定重新实现你的Scrtch工程,或者其中一小部分,它将不会是令人惊讶的-,本来也不应该是--如果你运行相同的游戏,或者是动画,亦或是用完全不同的设置,来运行拼图游戏,我们将看到相同的处理。
应用推荐