• In the extreme case, where we disregard taxes and we have to disregard some other problems, we get the same answer.

    在极限情况下,忽略税的因素,再忽略一些其他因素,就得出了同样的答案

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • It got 85. Same answer, but 50 calls instead of 85.

    答案还是85但是只调用了,50次而非85次。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So, when you divide by the mass to get the acceleration, you get the same answer.

    因此,当等号两边除以质量来求加速度时,结果是相同的

    耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

  • So I could at the same, I could do the same kind of analysis but we know I'll get the same answer.

    我们能够同理继续分析参与人II的,但我们都知道答案是一样的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Should we conclude,therefore, that the key to the important question--namely, What matters? the answer to that question, should we conclude,is,same personality?

    我们是否就该得出结论,重要问题的关键,也就是什么是最重要的,这问题的答案就是相同的人格吗?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It's hard to answer questions and whatnot and you don't necessarily have access to the same tools unless you yourself go through the process of configuring your machine manually by following many long sequences of steps.

    所以很难说会出现什么情况,你们不能,用同一台机器,除非你们自己按照一系列,冗长的步骤手工配置,你们自己的电脑。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • - The answer to that is definitely no -- if they had the same electron configuration, they would, in fact be neon. But we can think about different ions that have this electron configuration.

    答案是绝对没有-,如果它们具有相同的电子排布,那么它们,实际上,将都是氖,但是我们可以想一想,有没有其它离子具有这种电子排布呢?

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So once you look at Star Festival then you can think about the questions you have to answer and then question maybe the same thing I ask myself: who am I? While maybe some other questions.

    所以当你看“七夕“的时候,你可以考虑你必须要回答的问题,这个问题有可能是我问自己的那个同样的问题:,我是谁?或者其它的问题。

    麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

  • you are going to get the same answer.

    你都会得到相同的结果

    耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

  • Okay, so 1 is a viable answer in some contacts that needs constant time, the same amount of time no matter what.

    在需要常量时间的情况下,答案是1,不管怎样,总时间是,相同的。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • The answer lies in, if only we could know is that the same hunk of stuff or not.

    要知道答案,我们就要,我们就要知道是不是同一块东西。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But I want to stress again, as long as I do the base case right and my inductive or recursive step reduces it to a smaller version of the same problem, the code will in fact converge and give me out an answer.

    就开心的去做吧,但是我想再次强调,只要基础事件处理正确而我的递归,或递推步骤能把它简化为更简单的同类问题,那么这段代码就可以收敛。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • We have the same basic structure, the same outcomes, but we imagine people cared about different things and we end up with a very different answer.

    博弈的结构,结果都一样,但是人们在乎的东西不同了,所以我们得到了完全不同的答案

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And the answer, not that there aren't puzzles about it, but the answer is roughly, "It's the very same car if it's the very same hunk of metal and plastic and wires."

    而答案,虽然还存在疑问,但答案大致上是,如果是同一堆铁,塑料,电线,就是同一辆车“

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Wow. Well, I got the same answer.

    好的,我得到了相同答案。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Compare after 30 or 60 seconds with the person next to you and see if before I reveal the answer we can't get everyone on to the exact same page.

    和你身边的人比较30到60秒钟,看看是否在我揭露答案之前,我们不能使每个人,得到一个完全相同的页面。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • p1 because now they are pointing to exactly the same spot in memory.

    和p2是不是同一东西?,Answer’s,yes,答案是肯定的,因为现在它们指向。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定