On all of these, the majority of people who are not college students in elite universities say, "Oh, that's so wrong."

在这些例子中，大部份,不是精英大学学生的人会说，”大错特错了“

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So, all right. Good. Are there any other defenders who say it's just categorically wrong, with or without consent?

很好，有没其他人要辩护的,谁认为就是绝对错的，不管有没征得同意？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

You always want to check your signs at the and because it's so easy to get the sign wrong, and I was hoping that it was right here because I wasn't sure, but it turned out to be right.

我们完成计算时，一定要记得检查符号,因为很容易弄错符号，刚才我就不太确定,是否弄错了符号，检查发现没有问题。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

So, let's consider some people got it wrong, however, and let's see where that wrong answer might have come from, or actually, more importantly, let's see how we can all get to the correct answer.

我们来考虑一下为什么有些人做错了，然而我们来看看,这个错误的答案从何而来，或者事实上更重要的，我们来看看怎样才能都得到正确答案。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

It's still 1, because you plus plussed the wrong symbol called X. So for now, take-away from this, don't do this.

它还是1，因为你自增的是那个错误的叫做X的符号,现在，拿走这个，不这样做。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So one thing that's missing, or wrong if you like, but the one thing is the voters are not evenly distributed in the real world.

被忽视的因素,或者说错误在于,在现实生活中,每个立场的选民数并非是均分的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If he had all of that,it's not so clear to me that it would be the wrong thing to say that, by golly,this is Napoleon.

如果他都拥有这些，那我就不太确定，这么说是否错误了，天哪，这是拿破仑。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Which is sort of the question we'd immediately like to ask. Instead, I asked why did it produce the result it did. So I'm not asking myself what's wrong? Or how could I make it right?

其实这个问题我们马上就要问,我问了为什么它会返回这样的结果,因此我并没有去在意哪儿错了,或者我该怎么改正它，我在意的是它？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

We'll loop back as we go through the class to questions about what's gone so horribly wrong, and more important, from a public health point of view, what can be done about it?

当所有的课都上完后我们会再回头看,到底是什么出了问题,更重要的是,从公共健康的角度来看,如何才能纠正这些错误呢

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

This is one aspect of Biomedical Engineering, developing tools that allow you to understand how human's function and what's wrong when they have disease and so some of the things we've talked about have that category.

这是生物医学工程研究的一个方向,即设计那些能够让人们了解,人体的运转方式的工具,以及能够诊断疾病的工具,我们刚才讲过的一些东西就属于这类

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

He was spectacularly wrong, but I notice he's also no longer CEO;so, these things happen There is a general bias.

他彻彻底底的错了，但是我也注意到我们通常所见的偏见发生了,他也不再是CEO了。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

So, assuming -- if anyone got it wrong because of that, that's my apologies, that's my fault.

如果有人是因为这个原因做错了，那我非常抱歉，这是我的错。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Why 1? It's arbitrary, but it's anything other than zero so I just exit because something went wrong and this program is just going to bail.

为什么是1？这是任意的，但它是非零的,因为出错了，我退出程序,然后这个程序就释放了。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So what's wrong with that agreement? What are they?

这种协议有什么问题呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

My argument must be wrong because it goes against the lesson of the class and the lessons of the class are gospel right, they're not wrong ever, so what's wrong with that argument? Yes, Ale Well because you have to be able to agree, you have to be able to speak to them but we aren't allowed to show our partners what we wrote.

这个说法肯定有问题,因为这和我们的结论刚好背道而驰,结论是绝对正确的,结论没错,那这个说法错在哪,艾尔,因为你必须要能够达成一致,你需要和他们谈判,但是我们不允许同伴看到我的选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Only the operating system has controlling of byte zero NULL in the computer's RAM and so if a function ever returns null, aka zero, well, something must have gone wrong because that can't possibly belong to me that memory because by human convention zero is owned by the operating system; not by a program I wrote.

只用操作系统在内存中能够控制,字节0，并且如果一个函数返回，或者说0，好的，可能出错了,因为那可能是不属于我的内存,因为惯例上，0是由操作系统拥有的,而不是由我的程序拥有的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

But I'm not so confident anymore that it's the wrong thing to say.

但我不能再肯定那是错误的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So there's two things wrong with the argument.

这是这个说法的第二个漏洞

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选