• All right, let's try again. How many people vote that this is reversible? That looks like a majority to me. Irreversible?

    好的,让我们再试试,有多少人认为这是可逆的?,看上去大多数人都这么认为?

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • Right. If you look at the rest of that code, gee, it looks a lot like what I had elsewhere.

    好了如果你看看剩下的代码,天呐,看上去就像我在别的地方写过的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • So again, idea on the left, fairly straightforward, idea on the right, same but just looks a little different.

    从一方面来看,其中蕴含的编程思想是相当简单的,但从另一方面来看,相同中又有那么一丝不同。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • All right, so OK, it looks like we have a very mixed response in terms of the answer to the clicker question today.

    好的,看来今天课堂,习题的答案比较多样。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • It looks like a circular definition right now.

    这看起来像是循环定义了

    耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

  • Now, we get to draw some lessons out of this thing, so everybody who's feeling a little bit shell shocked from having been doing algebra and calculus and drawing pictures and feeling like they've been cheated into taking a class that looks far too much like economics, calm down we're going to actually talk right now.

    下面我们从中总结点经验出来,那些因为代数和微积分计算还有绘图,而感到十分不爽的同学,你们是不是感觉被我忽悠了,才会选这门一点都不像经济学的课啊,稍安勿躁,我们马上切入正题

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And if I go look at the polar form of this, OK, good, looks right, right?

    现在它有一个不同的坐标,以及跟原来相同的角度?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • All right. OK, looks like we got the majority, which is a good start, but we having discrepancy on what people are thinking.

    好的,OK,看来大部分人都做对了,这是个不错的开始,但还有一部分人的答案有分歧。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • So, you might ask, this looks pretty simple up here, right, just with that h hat.

    所以,你们可能会问,这个看起来太简单了,对,仅仅是。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • It's not necessary very well formatted but it looks pretty complex, right?

    排版不是很整齐,看起来也非常复杂,不是吗?

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • All right. So it looks like 82% got the correct answer here.

    好了,看来82%的同学做对了。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • It looks like it's pretty straightforward, right?

    这看起来很直接对不对?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • All right, so this looks pretty good.

    因此这个看起来挺好的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • It looks cleaner; right?

    看起来是整洁的,对不?

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • Done. All right? The basic, that primary search, because it looks at the first element, says it's smaller than everything else, I'm done.

    以及其他的元素,检索完成,让我试试二分法呢?,可能会用更长的时间,请注意这里的输出。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Right now it's a simple template, but it's a template for creating what a class looks like, and I now have an x- and y- value associated with each instance of this.

    那么大家明白了为什么,我说类是一个模板了,对不对?,现在它只是一个简单的模板,但是它是一个用来-,创建形成一个类的模板。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • This looks fine, right, I'm doing the right thing.

    然后返回这个数组,如果我去运行这个程序。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • All right, so it looks like we weren't showing the percentages here, but it looks like hopefully most of you were able to get the correct answer of H2 being the limiting reactant.

    看来我们好像没办法,显示结果的比例,但看起来大部分人,都能得到正确的结果,那就是H2是受限制的反应物2,看来现在我们还没搞明白。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • Let's type in foo. All right, so looks good, right?

    我输入Foo,好的,看起来不错,对不?

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • So in other words, if you terminate these lines early, if you terminate the four loop early, if you terminate an if condition early with that semicolon, the code may very well work; and this is a common source -- of frustration and conundrum because you don't -- because your code looks right and yet it's misbehaving, but that semicolon means stop looking for subsequent lines of related code.

    换句话说,如果你用分号过早的终止了这些代码行,如果你过早地终止了那个for循环,如果如此,一个if条件,代码可能可以运行,这就是,挫折和问题产生的源头,因为你没有-,因为你的代码看起来是正确的,但是运行是错误的,那个分号的意思是,停止寻找后面相关的代码。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定