What about Locke's account of private property and how it can arise before government and before law comes on the scene?

大家如何看待洛克关于私有财产,及其如何能早于任何政府法律而产生，这一观点？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So an arbitrary taking of property would be a violation of the law of nature and would be illegitimate.

所以任意掠夺他人财产,就侵犯了自然法，就是非法的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

And so in this law firm, one of these guys is an expert on intellectual property and the other one on fraud or something.

律师事务所也是一样的,有人是知识产权达人,别人可能处理欺诈案件很有经验

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty, and property would seem to support the idea of a government so limited that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.

任何法律都不能侵犯生命自由和财产权的观点,似乎是支持“有限政府“这一观点的,这点无疑很讨自由主义者欢心。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选